Why Do Cross-Terms Average to Zero for Incoherent Radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter davon806
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Please see the attached,this was extracted from my notes.(Left side is the 1st page).I was trying to prove the sentence underlined (on the right page). Given ε(r,t) , how can I prove that the cross-terms average to 0? Actually I don't really understand why there are cross-terms. Would be much appreciated if someone can elaborate the paragraph on right page in detail !
Q.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


To calculate the intensity and energy density, using the formula on left page, I suppose we need to find ε(r,t) ^2 by taking its dot product. However,this would give me a double integral which I don't know how to proceed...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you sum up and have a bunch of different frequencies (or take an F.T. and get a sum of ## E(\omega)exp^{i \omega t} ## over all frequencies), when you square the expression, the terms involving two frequencies (the cross terms) each time average to zero.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top