Why Do Theorists Use Series Expansion in Lagrangian Models?

Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a following question...

Can it be that there is given some Lagrangian and instead of considering whole Lagrangian one makes its series expansion and considers only some orders of expansion? Can you bring some examples or why and when does this happen... ?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One example are chiral effective theories like the skyrme model. The pion field appears as an SU(2) matrix

U(x)=e^{i\tau^a \phi^a(x)}

Nucleons are described by classical solitons

U_0(x)=e^{i\tau^a \phi_0^a(x)}

Now you can introduce fluctuations i.e. pions in a nucleon (soliton) background

U(x)=e^{i\tau^a (\phi_0^a + \pi^a)}

and expand the resulting Lagrangian in \pi(x) up to second order; you can couple this Lagrangian to el.-mag. fields and calculate photo-pion production; you can quantize the \pi(x) fluctuations and calculate quantum corrections to nucleon masses and form factors; ...

Have a look at (e.g.)

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9602359
Quantum Corrections to Baryon Properties in Chiral Soliton ModelsAuthors: Frank Meier, Hans Walliser
(Fachbereich Physik, U-GH Siegen, Germany)
(Submitted on 21 Feb 1996 (v1), last revised 14 Aug 1996 (this version, v2))
Abstract: We present a procedure to calculate 1-loop graphs in the soliton sector of chiral Lagrangians and use it to calculate quantum corrections to certain baryon observables in Skyrme-type models. Results generally show an improvement over the values obtained in tree approximation except for the case of the axial coupling g_A.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top