Why do we study right triangles in trigonometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avichal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Triangles
Avichal
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
Why do we study so much about right triangles like trigonometry. We could define sin and cos like functions in a 70 degree triangle too.
I also know right triangle is something special but i don't know what is it. Also why won't trigonometry on other type of triangles be not so good
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because right-angled triangles are simplest to start out with.
Furthermore, trigonometry based on that is sufficient to handle all questions you would like to ask non-right-angled triangles, as well. Thus, developing other types of plane trigonometry is unnecessary and a waste of time.
 
If you find yourself working with a lot of 70 degree triangles, or any other number of degrees for that matter, feel free to make a trig table based on that if you feel it will save you time.

Right triangles are preferable as the basis for trigonometry because any other triangle can be cut into two right triangles, by drawing a line through one vertex perpendicular to its opposite side. While you could, in this day and age of analytic geometry, draw a 70 degree angled line just as well as a perpendicular, the two triangles you got from that would have one with a 70 degree angle and the other with a 110 degree angle. So, you would need two trig tables to sort it all out (or a messy set of successive approximations).

Also, when you get to unit circle trig (if you haven't already), the right triangle definition correlates with the coordinates of a point on a grid in a way that is very neat and easy to see and use. You could come up with a formula based on other angles, but it would be much messier and harder to use.
 
sin and cos have not so much to do with triangles, they are the coordinates of points on the circle. the right triangles come in because the coordinate axes are perpendicular to each other.

The reason we use perpendicular axes, or right triangle trig, is the pythagorean theorem. The pythagorean theorem for other triangles is called the law of cosines and is more complicated.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top