Why Does a Charged Tape Attract to a Metal Sphere After Being Touched?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GT bear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charging
AI Thread Summary
A negatively charged plastic pen repels a charged piece of magic tape, which is also repelled by a metal sphere until the sphere is touched. After contact, the tape is attracted to the sphere, indicating a transfer of charge. The discussion identifies that electrons from the sphere can move into the salt water on the skin, and sodium ions can transfer to the sphere, leading to a nearly neutral state. The confusion arises from understanding the charge dynamics and the role of rubber-soled shoes as insulators. Ultimately, the correct answers highlight the interaction between the sphere, the tape, and the charged ions.
GT bear
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You observe that a negatively charged plastic pen repels a charged piece of magic tape. You then observe that the same piece of tape is repelled when brought near a metal sphere. You are wearing rubber soled shoes, and you touch the metal sphere with your hand. After you touch the metal sphere, you observe that the tape is attracted to the metal sphere. Which of the following statements could be true? Check all that apply.

Possible answers:

1. Electrons from the sphere moved into the salt water on your skin, where they reacted with sodium ions.

2. The excess negative charge from the sphere spread out all over your body.

3. Chloride ions from the salt water on your hand moved onto the sphere.

4. Sodium ions from the salt water on your hand moved onto the sphere.

5. Electrons from your hand moved onto the sphere.

6. Electrons from the sphere traveled through your body into the Earth.

7. After you touched it, the metal sphere was very nearly neutral.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have 3 total attempts at this (it is an online homework system, and although the problem seems very easy and basic, I have missed it twice.) My first try I selected answers: 1,2,4,6, and 7. On my second attempt I selected: 2,6, and 7. I really though my first attempt was correct, and now I am lost. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

I know (or at least I think I know), that there is no way that electrons/Cl- ions could transfer from your hand to the ball because of its negative charge. All the other answers seem logical, in that the charge is being dissipated into your body/skin, and that the metal sphere then becomes uncharged, I think I may be missing something though?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have only about 3 and a half hours until my assignment is due, so any help would be appreciated. I really do not know where my logic is wrong, the more and more I look at it, the more confused I become.
 
anyone have any ideas on this problem? I tried 1, 2, 6, and 7, but that also did not work.
 
This may be a few years too late but you are wearing tubber soled shoes so that would rule out #6 as rubber is acting as an insolator between you and the earth. Your first attempt was correct minus the 6.
 
i KNOW IT'S TOO late! but i will say the probable answers are 1 and 4 only. and about the 7th one i will say the sphere is nearly neutral not purely,and also the amount of charge on the magic tape is not so large that it will result into big electric polarisation of sphere and result in net attraction b/w them (even though little -ve charge is present on sphere.)
In the given options above i will vote 1 and 4 only and rest seems to me perfectly incorrect!
 
Even more late!

I just completed this homework assignment (and for GT as well, no less!), and here are, officially, the correct answers:

Electrons from the sphere moved into the salt water on your skin, where they reacted with sodium ions.

After you touched it, the metal sphere was very nearly neutral.

Sodium ions from the salt water on your hand moved onto the sphere.

The excess negative charge from the sphere spread out all over your body.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top