Why does a free particle in an infinite well have uncertainty bigger than h/2 ?

AI Thread Summary
A free particle in an infinite well exhibits uncertainty greater than h/2 due to its wave function characteristics. The discussion revolves around identifying the wave function that achieves the minimum uncertainty, with a suggestion that a normal (Gaussian) curve might be the answer. The ground state of the harmonic oscillator is proposed as a potential solution, characterized by a specific Gaussian wave function. Clarification is provided that this Gaussian function is essential for reaching the lower bound of uncertainty. Understanding these wave functions is crucial for grasping quantum mechanics principles.
drop_out_kid
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
verify the uncertainty principle by wave function of infinite well free particle(ground state)
Relevant Equations
\sai(x)=\sqrt {2/L} sin(Pi*x/L)dx
So I think I use the right approach and I get uncertainty like this:
1650392221348.png


And it's interval irrelevant(ofc),

So what kind of wave function gives us \h_bar / 2 ? I guess a normal curve? if so, why is normal curve could be? if not then what's kind of wave function can reach the lower bound
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Supplyment:
For <x^2>

1650392441964.png

for <x> it's simply L/2

for <p> it's simply 0

for <p^2> it's
1650392576119.png
by sin^2 integration.
 
drop_out_kid said:
So what kind of wave function gives us \h_bar / 2 ? I guess a normal curve? if so, why is normal curve could be? if not then what's kind of wave function can reach the lower bound
Try the ground state for the harmonic oscillator of mass ##m## and frequency ##\omega##.
 
kuruman said:
Try the ground state for the harmonic oscillator of mass ##m## and frequency ##\omega##.
Sorry I didn't get what that even is. We didn't learned that, I assume that's a ground state sinusoidal wave function?
 
drop_out_kid said:
Sorry I didn't get what that even is. We didn't learned that, I assume that's a ground state sinusoidal wave function?
You asked and I replied. It is a Gaussian, $$\psi_0(x)=\left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi \hbar}\right)^{1/4}e^{-\frac{m \omega}{2\hbar}x^2}.$$Try it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top