Why does a wrist have 3 degrees of freedom?

AI Thread Summary
The wrist is often cited as having three degrees of freedom due to its ability to rotate around three mutually perpendicular axes: radial/ulnar (z-axis), flexion/extension (x-axis), and pronation/supination (y-axis). However, there is debate among experts, with some sources stating the wrist has only two degrees of freedom, excluding pronation/supination as they occur primarily at the radioulnar joint. The discussion highlights that while the wrist facilitates certain movements, some actions can occur without it, leading to differing interpretations of its degrees of freedom. Ultimately, the classification of the wrist's degrees of freedom varies based on whether one includes the movements facilitated by adjacent joints. This ongoing debate reflects the complexity of anatomical definitions in biomechanics.
Alex8932
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Why does a wrist have 3 degrees of freedom?
Relevant Equations
The image at this link (https://i.stack.imgur.com/pcSjn.png) illustrates them but pronation can be done even without the wrist present so I don't understand why it is considered to be a degree of freedom of the wrist. During pronation the whole wrist itself is moving.
The other two movements make use of the wrist and can't be done without it so I see why they are considered to be degrees of freedom of the wrist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It has three degrees of freedom because it can be rotated about three mutually perpendicular axes.

If you label axes such that
z is perpendicular to the palm on the front of the right hand
x is along the outstretched thumb
y is along the four fingers

Then
Radial/ulnar is a rotation about the z-axis
Flexion/extension is a rotation about the x-axis
Pronation/suppination is a rotation about the y-axis

This idea of three mutually perpendicular axes is used in one version of the right hand rule which is implemented without rotation about any of the axes.
RHR.jpeg
 
At first I was skeptical, but after some thought I see your point.

Pronation is accomplished by the rotation of the radius and ulna about a common lengthwise axis. I'm not sure if the wrist joint itself makes any active movement; it seems to just go along for the ride.

pcSjn.png
"During pronation, the distal end of the radius rotates around the ulna from its position on the lateral side of the wrist to the medial side of the wrist. This action turns the hand, wrist, and forearm almost 180 degrees..."
https://www.innerbody.com/image/musc03.html#:~:text=During%20pronation%2C%20the%20distal%20end,the%20position%20of%20the%20arm.
kuruman said:
Then
Radial/ulnar is a rotation about the z-axis
Flexion/extension is a rotation about the x-axis
Pronation/suppination is a rotation about the y-axis

This idea of three mutually perpendicular axes is used in one version of the right hand rule which is implemented without rotation about any of the axes.
View attachment 322289
I don't see how this applies to the OP's question. It doesn't seem to restrict itself to the wrist joint.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I don't see how this applies to the OP's question. It doesn't seem to restrict itself to the wrist joint.
Perhaps the degrees of freedom of the wrist are defined by the ability of the hand to rotate about the three axes. This article says in the abstract that the wrist has 3 dof. However, there seems to be no consensus because this article in section "Joints of the Wrist and Hand" says "The wrist has two degrees of freedom[11], although some say three degrees of freedom because they include the movements of pronation and supination[8], which occur at the the radioulnar joint. The radioulnar joint is often referred to as a joint of the forearm but it is this articulation that gives the wrist more freedom of movement. The true joints of the wrist and hand are listed in the table below[11]."

So I guess the answer to OP's question "Why does a wrist have 3 degrees of freedom?" the answer seems to be, "Because some people have counted 3 whereas others have counted 2." I am no expert on the subject, so I will shut up at this point.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, DaveC426913, gmax137 and 2 others
Alex8932 said:
Homework Statement:: Why does a wrist have 3 degrees of freedom?
Relevant Equations:: The image at this link (https://i.stack.imgur.com/pcSjn.png) illustrates them but pronation can be done even without the wrist present so I don't understand why it is considered to be a degree of freedom of the wrist. During pronation the whole wrist itself is moving.

The other two movements make use of the wrist and can't be done without it so I see why they are considered to be degrees of freedom of the wrist.
Umm... Why not?
OK, then evolution, that's why. The people with these wrists made more babies that lived to replicate. Different for octopuses and zebras though.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top