Why does atmospheric pressure not keep liquids inside upside down cups?

AI Thread Summary
Atmospheric pressure can keep liquids inside narrow containers, like straws, but this effect diminishes in wider openings, such as upside down cups. For liquids to remain in an upside down cup, the pressure must be evenly distributed across the surface, which is disrupted by even slight variations. When the cup's opening is wide, these variations can lead to air bubbles forming, breaking the seal and allowing the liquid to escape. In contrast, narrow straws limit the potential for such disturbances, maintaining the liquid's position. The discussion highlights the importance of the opening size in determining whether atmospheric pressure can effectively hold liquid in place.
electronicsguy
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
If I hold the top end of a straw filled with water, the water stays in the straw which is due to the atmospheric pressure. How come this effect is not seen in upside down cups? Should the atmospheric pressure keep the liquid inside it within the cup since the other end is closed? Also, the radius of the cup is greater which means greater upward force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
You do see this effect in upside down cups - provided the mouth of the cup is below water level.
The key here is the width of the opening.

For the pressure difference to hold the water in the container, it needs to be exerted evenly over the whole surface.
A small variation, even for a moment, will make one side heavier, allowing a bubble of air to form and break the seal. You can see it if you use a glass jar - watch the opening as you lift it clear of the water.

Over a small surface, though, the variations do not usually build up so much.
You can break the symmetry by tilting the straw (if i's a wide one).
[If the straw is very narrow, then capillary effects can become important too.]

Your narrow straw is just restricting the number of things that can possibly go wrong ;)

The classic demonstration of the effect is in a vortex bottle -
http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-Make-a-Vortex-in-a-Bottle/
... the connecting hole has to be small (how small? experiment!) to make it work.
If you just up-ended the bottles quickly, no vortex forms, and water does not flow from one bottle to the next.
 
Ok so the uneven force of the atmospheric pressure due to a wide opening does not hold the liquid in tact. How does this have anything to do with the vortex bottle?
 
Try the bottle and see - experiment with different sized holes (without swirling the water).
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top