Why Does Displacing a Charge Lead to Simple Harmonic Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Displacing a charge +q from equilibrium between two identical charges +Q leads to simple harmonic motion due to the net force acting on it. The charge experiences forces from both +Q charges, which cancel out at the origin, but when displaced, the forces become unbalanced. The attempt to derive the angular frequency using only one charge leads to an incorrect formula, as the forces from both charges must be considered. The correct angular frequency is derived from the combined effect of both charges, resulting in omega=(4kqQ/(mb^3))^(1/2). Understanding the necessity of both forces is crucial for accurately describing the motion.
CrypticWeirdo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge +q of mass m is free to move along the x axis. It is in equilibrium at the origin, midway between a pair of identical point charges, +Q, located on the x axis at x = +b and x = -b. The charge at the origin is displaced a small distance x << a and released. Show that it can undergo simple harmonic motion with an angular frequency

omega=(4kqQ/(mb^3))^(1/2)

Homework Equations


E=ke(q/r2)
(1+c)n is approximately equal to 1+nc

a=x(omega)^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I'm not really asking for a solution per se. I get the question, got the correct answer, how it was done; what I want to know is why my method is wrong.

I got it by first using Coulomb's law to set up a force comparison, between the point-charge in the origin, and one of the point charges next to it. So...

F=kqQ/b2=ma

Where I substituted a for x(omega)^2.

Solving for omega got me close to the correct answer, but my TA could not explain why my method was wrong...so I'm curious why.

My answer was omega=(kqQ/(mb^3))^(1/2)

Any takers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CrypticWeirdo said:
I got it by first using Coulomb's law to set up a force comparison, between the point-charge in the origin, and one of the point charges next to it. So...

The charge is in equilibrium at the origin, the forces of repulsion due to two other charges cancel out. You cannot compare with only one other charge. The force on it is due to the other 2 charges.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top