Why does liquid co2 goes back to solid at atmospheric press

AI Thread Summary
Liquid CO2 transitions directly to solid at atmospheric pressure due to the unique properties of its phase diagram. When pressure drops from 5.11 atm to 1 atm, the temperature also decreases, which contributes to the solidification process. This phenomenon occurs because the rapid pressure drop allows some CO2 to evaporate, cooling the remaining liquid and facilitating the formation of solid CO2. The phase behavior indicates that under certain conditions, the liquid can bypass the gaseous state and revert to solid. Therefore, the solid state reforming from liquid CO2 at 1 atm is primarily a result of both pressure and temperature changes during the experiment.
vlajky
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I you look at the phase diagram, CO2 is in liquid state at 5,11 atm and t= -56 C. But why does he convert directly to solid state at 1 atm? Again, if you go down from five to one atm, you should be in gaseous state ? Is it have something to do with temperature ? What happens with temperature during the pressure drop?

I am specifically asking about liquid to solid transition that occur in the experiment explained below and why it happens during the pressure drop. On phase diagram if pressure drop from 5 to 1 atm at t= -56,6 c you are in the gaseous state? It must be the temperature drop all so ? If it is, why it happens ?

experiment :
Dry ice is placed into an PET plastic cylinder. A valve is closed and pressure in the cylinder increases. When the pressure reaches 511 kPa it stops increasing and liquid CO2 appears. The liquid begins to boil and when all solid CO2 is gone, the pressure increases further. The valve is opened and the pressure drops again to 1 atm. Eventually solid CO2 reforms, the liquid disappears? WHY THE SOLID STATE REFORMS AGAIN ( from liquid ) RATHER THEN GASEOUS ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without knowing the details I can hazard a guess. With the pressure drop some of the CO2 evaporates cooling the rest which becomes solid.
 
I think you're right. That's the only reasonable explanation. Thank you!:)
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top