Why does oxygen carry the positive F.C in [CH3OH2]+?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fridakahlo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxygen Positive
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the Lewis structure for [CH3OH2]+, where oxygen carries a positive formal charge despite its higher electronegativity compared to carbon. The participant notes that their initial assumption was for carbon to have an incomplete octet and thus the positive charge, but this was not feasible. They highlight the electronegativity difference between carbon and oxygen, which is 0.9, indicating a polar covalent bond. The conversation also touches on the conventional rule that the most electronegative atom should bear the negative formal charge. Ultimately, the focus is on understanding the formal charge distribution in the molecule.
fridakahlo
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the lewis structure for [CH3OH2]+

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the lewis structure to have a positive formal charge on the oxygen. I'm not sure why the oxygen would have the + f.c. since it is much more electronegative than fairly neutral carbon. I initially wanted carbon to have an incomplete octet, so it would carry the + charge, but that did not work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just looked up the electronegativity difference (Pauling scale) for Carbon and oxygen=0.9

So... this would be a polar covalent bond.

However, basic lewis structure rules say that the most electronegative atom should carry the negative formal charge. Right?
 
Start with CH3OH, then look for a lone pair which can hold H+.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top