Why Does Peak Intensity Not Double in a Double Slit Experiment?

Kyle91
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I've just got a couple of questions about this prelab I need to do for the Double Slit experiment.

And just to make sure this is clear (I have no idea whether the method used in this experiment is normal) we have a double slit and a slit blocker. The slit blocker is after the double slit that can be adjust so it blocks either, neither or both slits.

Now for the first question I have to compare (through calculations not data) the peak intensity of when both slits are open to when only one slit is open.

My thoughts are that when both slits are open the peak intensity would double simply because the two waves constructively interfere at their peaks to produce double the intensity. However this image: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/imgpho/muls2.gif from hyperphysics makes me think I'm wrong as it suggests the peak intensities are the same. Why am I wrong?

Also there's another question asking for a qualitative observation of what happens when the slit blocker goes gradually from blocking neither slit to blocking one slit. But I completely forgot to do this (massive prac) so could you please also confirm my suspicions?

I suspect that the peak would simply drop in intensity (though this may be proved wrong in my last question) and slowly gain a larger spread. As in, looking at that same link it slowly transforms from one to the other.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kyle,


So while searching for a diagram courtesy of Google, I found that the Wikipedia page actually had an image of exactly what you are looking for, and an explanation

I do hate to use Wikipedia like this but, easy is good. Check the "Overview" section image and explanation, it confirms exactly what you expected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment

I believe the Hyper physics image labels the single diffraction pattern as an "envelope", this multiplies the diffraction pattern of the double slit giving it the same peaks, and dips as the single slit, plus many more. But the intensity is "not to scale".

Regarding your second question, it will be complex as we usually use two equal sized slits and you are effectively changing the size of one slit. I would be interested to know the result!

All the best
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top