Why Does Relative Velocity of Approach Equal Zero at Minimum Distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellophyscis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Relative
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of relative velocity of approach between two moving particles, emphasizing that this velocity equals zero at the minimum distance between them. The equation V(Approach) = V1cosα + V2cosβ suggests that for the relative velocity to be zero, both cosine terms must equal zero simultaneously, which raises questions about the conditions under which this occurs. It is clarified that at the point of closest approach, the particles must not be moving towards or away from each other, meaning their velocity vectors lack components in those directions. The conversation also explores various angles (α and β) and scenarios, including cases where one angle is acute and the other obtuse, to illustrate the complexities of the situation. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the nuances of relative motion and the conditions for achieving minimum distance.
hellophyscis
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Given in my book-
1."Velocity Of approach - It is the rate at which distance between two moving particle decreases.
V(Approach) =V1cosα + V2cosβ "
2."When the distance between two particles is minimum, the relative veloctiy of approcah is 0"
attachment.php?attachmentid=63276&d=1382679140.jpg

3."V1cosα + V2cosβ = 0 ...when distance is minimum(diagram in attachment below)"
Please Explain Why?
And, the above equation will become 0 only if cosα = 0 and cosβ = 0 at same time, but if α and β are not equal, then cosα and cosβ cannot be 0 at same time. Thus the Equation is worng but giving correct answers.
Please Explain Why?
paint.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
the above equation will become 0 only if cosα = 0 and cosβ = 0 at same time,
What about when the situation: v1=v2=v, α = 0, and β=180deg.

For the two particles to be at the point f closest approach, they must be moving neither (1) towards each other nor (2) away from each other.

if (1) then they are getting closer,
if (2) then they have previously been closer,
thus, their velocity vectors must have no component pointing towards each other.

In your diagram, the two objects are not at closest approach - they are pictured getting closer together.
 
Your claim is that the equation is solved only when α and β are both right angles. Yes, that is one solution.

To make Simon's example more general (and less explicit), what if α is acute and β is obtuse?

What about cases where β > 180 degrees?
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top