Why does the author use Δ1 + Δ2 for C instead of just Δ2?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the author's choice to use Δ1 + Δ2 for the displacement at point C instead of just Δ2. It is clarified that Δ1 represents the displacement of point B due to an 80kN force, while Δ2 represents the additional displacement at C due to a 40kN force. The author defines Δ2 as the additional displacement beyond B's displacement to simplify the equations involved. Some participants question the necessity of including Δ1, suggesting that Δ2 alone could suffice for C's displacement. Ultimately, the choice may lead to simpler equations, though the overall simplicity remains unverified.
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I know that when the 80kN act on B , the frame will be dispalced by Δ1 to the right .. When the 40kN act on C , the frame will be displaced Δ2 to the right ... Why the author use Δ1 + Δ2 for C ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is the author wrong ? I think the author should use Δ2 at C instead of Δ1 + Δ2 for C , am i right ? Δ1 can / cannot be the same as Δ2 [/B]
 

Attachments

  • 579.png
    579.png
    83.1 KB · Views: 397
  • 580.png
    580.png
    29.9 KB · Views: 377
Physics news on Phys.org
The two horizontal loads are applied together. The author chooses to define Δ2 as C's additional displacement beyond that of B.
Do you have an issue with an equation based on that?
 
  • Like
Likes fonseh
haruspex said:
The two horizontal loads are applied together. The author chooses to define Δ2 as C's additional displacement beyond that of B.
Do you have an issue with an equation based on that?
why The author chooses to define Δ2 as C's additional displacement beyond that of B ? why can't the author define the displacement at C = Δ2 only ??
 
fonseh said:
why The author chooses to define Δ2 as C's additional displacement beyond that of B ? why can't the author define the displacement at C = Δ2 only ??
If you follow through the equations, some of them turn out simpler with the author's choice. Whether it is simpler overall I have not tried to determine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top