Why Does the Right Hand Side of 5.18 Only Have Two Derivatives?

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I am trying to follow my lecture notes, attached below, an argument to the number of degrees of freedom from the number of constraints of he Einstein field equations

The bit I a man stuck on is the second thumbnail, and the deduction that he righ hand side of 5.18 only has two derivatives at most. I see that the terms the connection multiplied by G must be a first derivative of the metric multiplied by a second derivative, since ## R \approx \partial\Gamma \implies G \approx \partial^2 g ##

However for the first term I would deduce a third derivative of the metric, since there's another derivative acting on ##G##

So I am unsure how to deduce the right hand side must at most have two derivatives of any type. Do I need to carry out some sort of dimensional analysis ? Obviously these terms must be consistent with each other, in turn consistent with the left hand side? From the second and third term I could agree with the statEment but not the first ? If so, I am unsure how to go about this...

Many thanks
IMG_0869.jpg

IMG_0870.jpg


Homework Equations



Above

The Attempt at a Solution



Above[/B]
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0869.jpg
    IMG_0869.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 624
  • IMG_0870.jpg
    IMG_0870.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 630
Physics news on Phys.org
bump?
 
The notes make the statement:
"But we know that the right hand side has at most two derivatives, of any kind."

I agree with you that this is not correct. The first term of the right hand side would have third-order derivatives of metric components with respect to spatial coordinates ##x^i##. I believe the statement should have said something like:
"But we know that the right hand side has at most two time derivatives of any of the ##g_{\mu \nu}##."

With this correction, the next statement of the notes is still correct. That is, "there cannot be any term in ##G^{t \nu}## with two time derivatives in it".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Geofleur
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top