Why does this system have zero potential energy and only one degree of freedom?

sayf alawneh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
the question is : particles m1 and m2 each of mass m are connected by a massless rod with length l , these particles move on a frictionless horizontal plane as shown in the screen shot , the movement of m1 is fixed on a frictionless circular track of radius R , find the E.O.M !

Homework Equations


here we can find T and V and use the lagrangian easily

The Attempt at a Solution


i found the kinetic energy and found the potential energy but for some reason my doctor said that the potential energy is zero for this system can anybody tell me why , please i need help :(
also i solved for theta and phy but the doctor said that this system can be solved for theta only considering it the only degree of freedom ! why is that we have 2 degrees of freedom theta and phy so why we consider theta the only degree of freedom ![/B]
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    4.8 KB · Views: 443
Physics news on Phys.org
oops sorry i miss readed the part which is saying that its moving on the horizontal plane XD
but i havnt figured out why theta is the only DOF
 
There are definitely two degrees of freedom, ##\theta## and ##\phi##, unless there is some sort of constraint that was left out in the statement of the problem.

It's possible to find a differential equation of motion that involves only one of the degrees of freedom. But I'm not sure what your professor was saying about treating the system as effectively having only one degree of freedom.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top