Why does viscosity have units of pressure times time?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the units of viscosity, specifically why viscosity is expressed in Pascal-seconds. Participants explore the relationship between viscosity, shear stress, and velocity gradients, as well as the implications of these units in understanding fluid behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that viscosity is a proportionality parameter relating shear stress to the velocity gradient in a fluid, necessitating specific units to maintain dimensional consistency.
  • One participant questions whether there is a deeper reason for viscosity being represented as pressure times time, suggesting that the cancellation of dimensions in the velocity gradient may not have significant meaning.
  • Another participant mentions that understanding viscosity can be approached by considering the relationship between shear stress and shear rate rather than deriving it solely from unit analysis.
  • A participant discusses how applying greater force results in greater resistance to flow, linking this to the time factor in viscosity, although they acknowledge this reasoning is based on prior knowledge of the units.
  • There is a clarification regarding the distinction between dynamic and kinematic viscosity, with one participant noting the confusion between the two terms and correcting it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and reasoning regarding the units of viscosity, with no consensus on a deeper meaning behind the dimensional analysis. Some agree on the relationships involved, while others question the significance of the units.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention different "flavors" of viscosity, such as dynamic and kinematic, and their respective units, which may introduce additional complexity to the discussion. There are also references to Newton's law of viscosity and its implications for Newtonian fluids, indicating that the discussion may not cover all aspects of fluid dynamics.

pa5tabear
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Pascal-seconds is a unit of viscosity. Why?

I know that viscosity represents the thickness of a fluid, or its ease of flow, but I don't understand why that is represented by these parameters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Viscosity is essentially a proportionality parameter relating shear stress to the velocity gradient in a fluid. Viscosity, therefore, must have units that make the equation work. Shear stress is defined as
[tex]\tau = \mu \nabla \vec{v}[/tex]
where the units are, therefore
[tex][\text{Pa}] = [\text{Pa}\cdot\text{s}]\dfrac{[\text{m}/\text{s}]}{[\text{m}]}[/tex]
 
I take the question to be seeking some underlying reason why viscosity should be pressure * time, as though there is some set up in which the relationship emerges naturally without any other dimensions being involved along the way.
I don't think such can be found. The two distance measurements that dimensionally cancel are both in the velocity gradient, so a more fundamental question is why a velocity gradient should have dimension of 1/time, or frequency. The two distances are perpendicular to each other, which suggests to me the cancellation has no deep meaning.
Similar coincidences arise, e.g. angular momentum and action; note that one is a vector while the other is a scalar. OTOH, angular momentum is quantised, so maybe there is a deep meaning in that case.
 
Yes. For one of my classes we have to memorize lots of constants and conversions and I'm looking for a way to really understand the units of viscosity. I know the relationships but I was wondering if there's more to it. Sounds like not.

I also asked a professor today and he said I should think about it as the relationship between shear stress and shear rate and get the units from that instead of trying to derive a relationship from the units.
 
Having known the result, I guess we can reason out to an extent why the unit involves the product of pressure (which is basically force on a unit area) and time. We can get a measure of the thickness of the fluid by studying its reaction to an applied force. If I apply a greater force, I will get a greater resistance to its flow. As far as the time is concerned, you can study how much time it takes to flow a particular distance (or area, since we took force per unit area). More viscous fluids will take a longer time to flow. Since both factors mean greater viscosity, their being multiplied is acceptable.

Then again, I'm saying this because I already know the units.
 
pa5tabear said:
Pascal-seconds is a unit of viscosity. Why?

Be careful- there are two 'flavors' of viscosity, 'kinematic' (typically units of Poise) and 'dynamic' (typically units of Stokes). Viscosity refers to the diffusion of momentum.

Poise has units of M/LT (say, kg/m*s) and is thus equivalent to both pressure*time and momentum/area. Stokes has units of L^2/T, say m^2/s.
 
In the simplest geometry, the so-called shear rate is equal to the rate of change of tangential velocity with respect to distance from the wall: dv/dy. According to Newton's law of viscosity, the shear stress at the wall is equal to the viscosity times the shear rate at the wall.

τ = η (dv/dy)

Shear stress has units of m/(l s2)

Stress has the same units as pressure.

Shear rate has units of (1/s)

For Newtonian fluids, Newton's law of viscosity in 3D is much more complicated than this (and involves the stress tensor and the rate of deformation tensor), but the general idea and the units are the same.
 
You flipped kinematic and dynamic there, Andy. I figured if just clear that up.
 
boneh3ad said:
You flipped kinematic and dynamic there, Andy. I figured if just clear that up.

Thanks- dyslexic am I.
 
  • #10
Andy Resnick said:
Thanks- dyslexic am I.

Apparently you are as dyslexic as I am a bad typist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K