Why Does Water Refract Light and Improve Visibility?

AI Thread Summary
Water refracts light, causing images to appear blurry when viewed without goggles due to the divergence of light rays. Goggles restore the air-eye interface, allowing the eye to focus light rays correctly, despite some distortion from the water-goggle-air transition. The human eye is adapted to focus light effectively at the air-eye interface, which is not the case underwater. While the eye could theoretically adjust its focal length to see clearly underwater, the curvature required may exceed its capability. The discussion highlights the importance of the air interface for proper vision and the challenges posed by light refraction in water.
harimakenji
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If you dive without goggles, you can't see very clearly. Why?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I guess the reason is water around the eyes refracts the ray so that the image produced in the eye is blur. Right?

But why when using goggle we can see clearer? There is also refraction occurs when light travels from water to the goggle, so why the image produced isn't blur?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to understand that in order to see a focused image, the eye must converge all the rays from the object to basically a single point at the back of the eye.
If the light rays diverge, or converge at a point slightly ahead or behind the back of the eye then the image will appear blurry.

So, by the design of our eyes there is only so much distance from the front to the back with which the eye has to focus the light rays, and our eyes have been adapted to do so at an interface of air->eye.

Technically, though, all the eye would have to do to see underwater without goggles is adjust the focal length of the eye enough, but depending on the curvature this required it may not be possible for the human eye to achieve.

Now, when you use goggles, you restore the air->eye interface, so even though the incoming rays may themselves still be refracted from the goggles, the eye is now capable of converging those rays to a single point at the back of the eye once again.
However, due to the water->goggle->air this refraction can cause other distortions like objects appearing slightly out of position, which depends largely on the angle you are looking, but even though those rays were bent the eye can still converge them because it has an air interface inside the goggles.

BTW: I think the inside of the eye has an index of refraction very close to water (I could be wrong) in that case when you don't have goggles on there would be almost no refraction so the light rays would not converge properly.
 
Thanks a lot for the explanation buddy !
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top