Why doesn't Noether thm produce exactly the stress-energy tensor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Noether's theorem in classical field theory to derive conserved currents from the electromagnetic Lagrangian, specifically \(\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\). The Noether conserved current is expressed as \(T^{\mu \nu}=-F^{\mu \sigma}\eta^{\nu\lambda} \partial_\lambda A_\sigma + \tfrac{1}{4} \eta^{\mu\nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta}\), which differs from the classical electromagnetic stress-energy tensor \(\hat T^{\mu \nu}=-F^{\mu \sigma}\eta^{\nu\lambda} F_{\lambda \sigma} + \tfrac{1}{4} \eta^{\mu\nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta}\) by a total divergence \(K^{\mu\nu} = \partial_\sigma \left( F^{\mu \sigma} A^{\nu} \right)\). The inquiry focuses on why Noether's procedure does not yield a symmetric classical stress-energy tensor and the physical significance of \(K^{\mu\nu}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noether's theorem in classical field theory
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic Lagrangians and tensor notation
  • Knowledge of conserved currents and their physical implications
  • Basic concepts of stress-energy tensors in field theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of conserved currents using Noether's theorem in various field theories
  • Explore the implications of total divergence terms in the context of conservation laws
  • Study the properties and applications of symmetric stress-energy tensors in physics
  • Examine the physical interpretations of differences between derived and classical stress-energy tensors
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on classical field theory, particularly those interested in the implications of Noether's theorem and stress-energy tensor formulations.

roomzeig
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In classical field theory, use noether theorem to compute conserved currents for electromagnetic Lagrangian.
\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}, \quad F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu
For arbitrary translational symmetries, the Noether conserved current evaluates to:
T^{\mu \nu}=-F^{\mu \sigma}\eta^{\nu\lambda} \partial_\lambda A_\sigma + \tfrac{1}{4} \eta^{\mu\nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta}
which is almost but not equal to the classical enm stress energy tensor:
\hat T^{\mu \nu}=-F^{\mu \sigma}\eta^{\nu\lambda} F_{\lambda \sigma} + \tfrac{1}{4} \eta^{\mu\nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta}
with the difference being a total divergence:
K^{\mu\nu} \equiv \hat T^{\mu\nu} - T^{\mu\nu} = \partial_\sigma \left( F^{\mu \sigma} A^{\nu} \right)

I understand that the difference does not change global conservation etc, but why is it that the Noether procedure does not produce a *symmetric* classical stress energy tensor? is there a physical meaning of K^{\mu\nu}? if \hat T^{\mu nu} is interpreted, on the grounds of ENM, as stress-energy, what is T^{\mu\nu}?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K