Why doesn't the Moon fall to Earth despite gravitational attraction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tianyi.tan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
The Moon does not fall to Earth because it is in constant free fall towards the Earth while also moving sideways at a sufficient speed, creating an orbit. If the Moon were released without any tangential velocity, it would fall directly to Earth instead of orbiting. The gravitational force acting on the Moon is always perpendicular to its motion, maintaining its circular path. For the neutron star problem, the fastest rotation rate can be calculated using centripetal acceleration and gravitational force equations, leading to a tangential speed of approximately 1.152 x 10^8 m/s. This results in about 917 revolutions per second for the outer particles of the neutron star.
tianyi.tan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.. some stuff from my tutorial I'm confused about, pls help! thanks:)
1) Why does the moon not fall and hit the earth? Since both exert attractive forces on each other, there should be some kind of acceleration towards a common point.. ><
2)When the Earth and moon are held at rest at their present separation and released to move, would the moon orbit the earth? Or would it then fall to the earth?
3) "Despite its mass and size, a typical neutron star can rotate about its own axis at a high speed. What is the fastest rate of rotation of a neutron star such that matter still remains at its surface? Assume that the radius of the neutron star is 20.0km & its mass is 3.98 x 10^30kg." What concepts should I use to solve this problem? thanks :D:D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. They are constantly falling (being accelerated) toward each other. But they are also moving sideways wrt each other - fast enough that they never hit each other. That's what an orbit is.

2. If they had no tangential velocity, they would fall straight together like a ball dropped straight down from your hand. But they have a tangential velocity, like a ball thrown sideways with respect to the earth.

3. Are these homework? Did you learn about centripedal acceleration yet? There is an equation for it...
 
hi, thanks so much!
regarding (3), yupp I have learned about centripetal acceleration, but I'm not sure what they mean by the matter staying on the surface. Am I supposed to equate v2/r to the gravitational field strength? :S
 
tianyi.tan said:
Hello.. some stuff from my tutorial I'm confused about, pls help! thanks:)
1) Why does the moon not fall and hit the earth? Since both exert attractive forces on each other, there should be some kind of acceleration towards a common point.. ><
2)When the Earth and moon are held at rest at their present separation and released to move, would the moon orbit the earth? Or would it then fall to the earth?
3) "Despite its mass and size, a typical neutron star can rotate about its own axis at a high speed. What is the fastest rate of rotation of a neutron star such that matter still remains at its surface? Assume that the radius of the neutron star is 20.0km & its mass is 3.98 x 10^30kg." What concepts should I use to solve this problem? thanks :D:D

1. The force of attraction is perpendicular to the velocity of the moon's orbit - ie the moon is traveling tangential to the orbit, assuming a circular orbit. Thus there is no component of the force in the direction of motion. The force remains perpendicular to the motion as it moves so it simply changes the direction of the moon's motion. This is an example of uniform circular motion. The acceleration is always directed towards the centre of the Earth (approximately) no matter where the moon is.

2. In this case the moon would move straight towards the Earth because it does not have an initial motion perpendicular to the gravitational force.

3. We know
a=\frac{GM}{r} (Newton's Law of Gravitation)

and a = \frac{v^{2}}{r} (centripetal acceleration)

thus

\frac{Gm}{r^{2}} = \frac{v^{2}}{r}

v= \sqrt{\frac{Gm}{r}} gives the tangential speed of the particles

= \sqrt{\frac{6.67e-11*3.98e30}{20e3}}

= 1.152 *10^8 m/s

This is the tangential speed of the outer particles, assuming the star's mass is concentrated at its centre.

Circumfrence = 2pir = 1.257 * 10^5m

Thus 1.152 *10^8/1.257 * 10^5 = 917 revolutions per second required.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top