Why Is a Bullet More Damaging Than Falling Out of Bed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blue_phoenix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eye Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of the damaging effects of a bullet versus falling from a bed. The kinetic energy of a bullet fired from a Walther PPK is calculated to be approximately 622.05 J, while the gravitational potential energy of a person resting 1 meter above the ground is similarly around 622.3 J. The key point made is that a bullet causes more damage due to its smaller surface area, which concentrates impact force on a small area, whereas the impact from a fall is distributed across the body. The calculations for both energies are confirmed to be accurate, emphasizing the significant difference in damage potential. Overall, the conversation highlights the physics behind the lethality of bullets compared to minor falls.
blue_phoenix
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Bond's usual gun of choice in every movie is a Walther PPK (except when he can get his hands on a machine gun
which blows up more guys). A bullet like this has a mass of around 15g and leaves the gun at 288m/s. Calculate the
kinetic energy in a bullet like this.
2.Aside from shooting bad guys, Bond has a lot off success with, ummm, the ladies. Imagine he is resting in bed one morning
1 m off the ground and that his mass is 63.5 kg. What is his potential energy relative to the ground when he in bed?
3. Do answers from (1) and (2) surprise you? Why is a bullet more damaging than falling out of bed from a height of 1 m?

2. I think i have to use the formula of kinetic energy. Kinetic energy = (mv^2)2 and gravitational potential energy = mgh
sorry i can't use the codes properly so i wrote it this way :redface:

3. For number 1 i did

E_k=(mv^2)/2
= (0.015)(288^2)/2
=622.05 J
=6.22 x 10^2 J
so the kinetic energy is 6.22 x 10^2 J
Is this approximation correct since the question has 3 sig figs?

for number 2 i did

Eg=mgh
=63.5 x 9.80 x 1
=622.3 J
=6.22 x 10^2 J
so the gravitational potential enegry is 6.22 x 10^2 J
Is it also appropriate?

for number 3 i wrote
A bullet is more damaging than falling out of bed from height of 1 m because a bullet with its smaller surface area causes more impact on the small area thus creating more damage where is the pressure by falling one meter is spread through the whole body enabling the body to dissipate the damage and get less hurt.

Is it accurate?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
looks fine, except that you wrote different speeds, 288 and 228 :)
 
thank you.sorry that was a typing error. so is my third answer correct i mean is it alright to use those terms i used? also can i ask some more questions related to this topic in here? :)
thank you very much
 
Kinetic energy is 1/2 mv^2
 
mgb_phys said:
Kinetic energy is 1/2 mv^2
yes i did write that :)
i just wrote the whole thing and divided by two :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top