Why is absolute zero important in the PV = nRT formula?

AI Thread Summary
Absolute zero is significant in the PV = nRT formula because it represents the theoretical point where a gas's volume would be zero, indicating that the gas particles have minimal kinetic energy. The experiment involving a capillary tube and trapped air demonstrates how increasing temperature leads to increased pressure and volume, aligning with the gas laws. By plotting the relationship between volume and temperature, one can extrapolate to find absolute zero, which serves as a reference point for gas behavior. Understanding absolute zero helps clarify the ideal gas law and the limits of gas behavior under extreme conditions. This concept is crucial for both theoretical studies and practical applications in thermodynamics.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Today in school I performed an experiment that went like this:

We had a capillary tube with trapped air on the bottom, the top part was open to the atmosphere and, in between, there was some sulphuric acid.

We heated the capillary tube and recorded the increase in volume of the trapped air and the temperature.

We were trying to check I believe how an increase in temperature will cause an increase in pressure, moving the sulphuric acid upwards, increasing the volume until the pressure outside was equal to that "inside".

We then went to the computer lab and plotted the relation between volume and temperature and tried to find absolute zero...

I didn't understand that... Why would we graph the temperature against volume and try and find absolute zero. Why do this experiment to determine the absolute zero?

I believe because absolute zero is when volume is = 0. But why is it equal to zero, at least in an ideal gas, which I am studying.

Thanks,
Peter G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a famous formula PV = nRT.

Just google it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top