DarylMBCP said:
Oh, I see so just to be clear, current is the amount of charge between a certain region per second.
The phrase "between a certain region" is fuzzy. The right way to say it is: current is the rate at which charge flows
past a given point per second.
Imagine you're sitting on the side of the road at a certain point, and cars drive by you at a rate of three cars per second. This kind of measurement of charge per second going by a given point is constant at all points along a particular series branch.
A resistor in a circuit will maintain the amount of charge/second throughout the circuit but the voltage will decrease as some work is done because of the resistor. Am I right?
There seems to be a problem in that sentence after the word "but." The way you said that, it sounds as though you are picturing voltage as something that gets "used up" and therefore decreases gradually with time. That's wrong.
Think of the voltage as forming fixed steps along a path from a point of maximum potential point to a point of minimum potential.
Picture you're on top of a mountain at an altitude of 5000 meters above the base. You want to go down to the bottom. You can go down in one big hike of 5000 m. Or, if you want, you can go down by following several short trails that will take you down 2000 m, then another 500, then another 1500, then another 1000, and now you're at the bottom. There is a fixed total difference in altitude between two extreme end points, regardless of which path you take.
Similarly, the voltage across a resistor in a circuit is how much of a drop there is in the electrical potential between two points. If there are several resistors in series, then their individual voltage drops will have to add up to be the total voltage drop for the whole trip, from the most positive point to the most negative point.