Why Is Energy Liberated When NaCl Forms from Sodium and Chlorine?

AI Thread Summary
Energy is liberated when NaCl forms from sodium and chlorine due to the strong electrostatic attraction between the Na+ and Cl- ions. This attraction overcomes the initial energy required to remove an electron from sodium and add it to chlorine. As the ions come together, they release energy, similar to how photons are emitted when electrons transition to lower energy levels. The energy released during the formation of the ionic bond is a result of the system moving to a lower energy state. Ultimately, energy is conserved throughout the process.
chops369
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If removing electrons from atoms requires energy, and adding electrons to atoms usually liberates energy, then why is energy liberated when the ionic compound NaCl forms from the elements sodium and chlorine?

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


My solutions manual says: "Once Na+ and Cl- have been made, the attraction between them is very strong, resulting in the liberation of energy."

I do not understand why the strong attraction between the ions would liberate energy. My book relates it to the emission of a photon when electrons move from higher to lower energy levels, but this just confuses me even more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First thing is to look up the energy needed for liberating a e from Na.
And the energy that Cl gives after taking an electron.

Secondly what happens when two charged ions get closer to each other? Meaning that they are attracted by a force over a distance. (HINT E=F*x)

If ultimately they stop what happens to that energy? Where does it all go?

Energy will be conserved no matter what!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top