Why is Everything Accelerating on the Surface of Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating
AI Thread Summary
Everything moving on the Earth's surface is likely accelerating due to the planet's rotation and the resulting centripetal acceleration. Acceleration is defined as a change in velocity, which can occur even if the speed remains constant, as seen when objects change direction. Friction also contributes to acceleration, affecting all objects on Earth. The analogy of a car on a racetrack illustrates how constant speed with directional change still results in acceleration. Thus, the Earth's round shape and motion lead to continuous acceleration for objects on its surface.
Omid
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Here is a discussion Question :

Overlooking the planet's own motion, why is it likely that everything moving for any appreciable distance on the surface of the Earth is accelerating?

Pleas help me with this question. I think it's talking about acceleration due to changing the velocity vector.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
its because the the Earth is in rotation, and there is a centripital acceleration.
 
Acceleration means rate of change of velocity. Velocity is a vector. If the velocity changes direction then acceleration occurs even if the magnitude of the vector remains fixed.
 
I'll add to what Tide said:

In space, just because things have a velocity does not mean they are accellerating. However, on earth, you will experience friction of one kind or another. That friction is an accelleration and therefore anything on Earth should be experiencing it.
 
I agree with Tide. You are supposed to ignore the Earth's motion, but not the fact that the world is round. It's like when a car goes around a race track even at a constant speed, its velocity is considered to be changing because its direction is changing. And the definition of acceleration is 'a change in velocity'. So the Earth is like a big round racetrack.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top