Why Is Krypton the Product in This Nuclear Reaction?

Hooly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain to me why the answer to the following question is Krypton? A step by step solution would be ideal please!

(b)The following reaction occurs in a nuclear reactor:

235U+01n →141Ba+X+301n+202.5MeV
(i) Identify the element X.

Many thanks!
(Question is Q12 b part i from the 2010 Irish state physics exam http://examinations.ie/archive/exampapers/2010/LC021ALP000EV.pdf )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I initially took this approach;
235 + 1 -141 -3(1) which is equal to 92. When I checked the answer this was incorrect. Then went down the route of converting the MeV to joules and subbing that value into the mass- energy equivalence formula in order to find the mass, and then using the unified atomic mass unit value (1.6605402x10^-27 kg) to try to find the element represented by the energy, at which point I got lost and have been unable to proceed further. Bear in mind I am 18 and studying for my Leaving Cert in Ireland (equivalent of SATs in US I think) so I am not at an advanced level
 
Which number determines the chemical element?
 
Do you guys just reply with questions? :P But yes I realized earlier that atomic number was the way to go, wasn't thinking straight, over complicated it. Many thanks ✌️
 
Hooly said:
Do you guys just reply with questions? :P
The idea is to help you to find the answer, and questions often work best.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top