Why is Material Toughness the Ability to Absorb Energy Before Fracture?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of material toughness, specifically its definition as the ability to absorb energy before fracture. Participants explore the relationship between toughness, strength, and ductility, and question how these properties interact to influence energy absorption in materials. The scope includes theoretical considerations and material-specific examples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define toughness as the ability of a material to absorb energy during deformation before fracture, linking it to high ductility and strength.
  • Others argue that the questions posed are too general and suggest that answers should be material-specific, citing examples like iron and gold to illustrate varying toughness and suitability for structural applications.
  • A participant questions the formulation of the original question, suggesting it lacks clarity for a well-defined answer.
  • Some participants reference the Charpy impact test as a method to measure the energy absorbed by a material during fracture, connecting it to the concepts of force and displacement in the context of work done on the material.
  • Another participant emphasizes that work must be done to deform a material, noting that both tensile strength and ductility contribute to the energy absorbed before fracture.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the discussion should focus on general principles or specific materials. There is no consensus on the best approach to connect toughness with strength and ductility, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity in the questions posed, suggesting that the lack of specificity may hinder the discussion. The relationship between toughness, strength, and ductility remains complex and is not fully resolved.

Dario56
Messages
289
Reaction score
48
Toughness is defined as ability of material to absorb energy when deforming before fracture. Materials with high ductility and strength will have high toughness.

What is meant by ability of material to absorb energy? What is connection between strength, ductility and ability to absorb energy so that materials with high strength and ductility can absorb a lot of energy before fracture?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
These questions seem to me to be too general. The answers I suppose probably should be material-specfic. Iron is regarded as tough, but it rusts, so we carbonize it, alloy it with other materials, and thereby turn it to steel and so make it tougher. Gold doesn't rust, and it's very malleable and ductile, but you wouldn't want to rely upon it for structure -- neither for cutlery nor skyscrapers -- chromium is the hardest element, and it can be shiny, but (unoxidized) silver is the shiniest element.
 
sysprog said:
These questions seem to me to be too general. The answers are material-specfic. Iron is regarded as tough, but it rusts, so we carbonize it, alloy it with other materials, and thereby turn it to steel and so make it tougher. Gold doesn't rust, and it's very malleable and ductile, but you wouldn't want to rely upon it for structure -- neither for cutlery nor skyscrapers -- chromium is the hardest element, and it can be shiny, but (unoxidized) silver is the shiniest element.
Question is general. However, answer doesn't need to be material specific. How can we connect material's ability to absorb energy with its ductility and strength?
 
If we're avoiding being material-specific, can we instead be purpose-specific? -- I think that your question,

Dario56 said:
How can we connect material's ability to absorb energy with its ductility and strength?

is not well formulated enough to be well answerable.
 
See the charpy impact test:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charpy_impact_test

The test measures the energy absorbed by the fracturing sample. Consider the definition of work: W = F * D. If you want to increase work done at fracture(by the sample on the hammer) you can either increase the force (tensile strength) or the distance (ductility/how far it stretches before breaking).
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog and Dario56
russ_watters said:
See that chirpy impact test:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charpy_impact_test

The test measures the energy absorbed by the fracturing sample. Consider the definition of work: W = F * D. If you want to increase work done at fracture(by the sample on the hammer) you can either increase the force (tensile strength) or the distance (ductility/how far it stretches before breaking).
Yes, I think got it. It is important to know that to deform material, work needs to be done which material absorbs. For example in uniaxial tensile test, work is done by outer tension force of the machine acting on the material sample. If material is strong, it requires a lot of force to break it which increases work done or energy absorbed. If material is ductile, it requires a lot of deformation to break it which increases displacement of the sample from starting point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K