Why is my compound pendulum experiment not proving Rouths Rule?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced in proving the compound pendulum theory, specifically in relation to Routh's Rule and the calculation of the radius of gyration (k) for a compound pendulum experiment involving a long thin bar. Participants explore the implications of different formulas and their applications in measuring gravitational acceleration (g) and k.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes an experiment measuring the time period of a compound pendulum and expresses confusion over discrepancies between experimental results and theoretical predictions based on Routh's Rule.
  • EmilyM suggests that the correct formula for k should be k^2 = (L^2)/12 instead of k^2 = (L^2)/3, depending on the context of the pendulum's pivot point.
  • A later reply indicates that the participant's experiment was indeed measuring k at the center of mass, while the original formula used was for k at the end of the bar, clarifying the relationship between the two using the parallel axis theorem.
  • Another participant agrees with EmilyM's clarification and emphasizes the importance of using the correct formula for the specific shape of the bar.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to use the correct formula for k based on the pivot point of the pendulum. However, there is a lack of consensus on the implications of using different formulas and how they relate to the experimental results.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the relationship between different formulas for k and the implications of measuring at different points along the bar, but do not resolve the broader question of how these adjustments affect the overall validity of Routh's Rule in this context.

EmilyM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble prooving a basic compound pendulum theory - my company makes a piece of kit designed to do just that.

In a simple experiment involving a long thin bar which is set on a knife edge and allowed to swing freely I have been changing the length of the bar and measuring the time period.

The equation is tau = 2 pi * sqrt((k^2 + h^2) / g * h) designed to enable us to find a local estimate for g (gravity) and k - the radius of gyration of the rod. Plotting a graph and rearranging the eqn into y = mx + c gives an estimation of 9.84 for gravity (very good) and 0.268 for k.

The theory for k is simple, Rouths Rule states k^2 = (L^2) / 3. This gives k = 0.528.

Help. Have redone the expt over and over with increasing accuracy to no avail. Am confident that Rouths Rule holds as is 12.7mm diameter st/st rod with L = 915mm.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
EmilyM: If you want to use tau = 2*pi*[(k^2 + h^2)/(g*h)]^0.5, then you must use k^2 = (L^2)/12, not k^2 = (L^2)/3. But if you want to use k^2 = (L^2)/3, then you must use tau = 2*pi*[(0.25*k^2 + h^2)/(g*h)]^0.5. See if this resolves your problem.
 
Oh dear! Well that's what it is then, works perfectly now - thank you so much!

Ps, tau is the letter representing time period in the textbooks/refs I've been using...
 
I should also mention, the best form for your tau formula is the one you listed in your first post (which is the same as the first tau formula I listed in my post), because it is general, and is therefore applicable to any object shape. Then, for your current, particular bar shape (a uniform bar), use k^2 = (L^2)/12.
 
I agree, and I also now understand that my experiment was finding k at the centre of mass but the original formula I was using to find theoretical k (k^2 = (L^2) / 3) is to find k at the end of the bar.

k^2 = (L^2)/12 finds k at the centre of mass and this is what i wanted. The two are ofcourse related by the parallel axis theorem so that to 'move' from k at the centre of mass to k at the end of the bar you must add on a factor which is the distance squared, in this case (L/2)^2 or (L^2)/4. Then we have k^2 = (L^2)/12 + (L^2)/4 = (L^2)/12 + 3(L^2)/12 = 4(L^2)/12 = (L^2)/3 (most people could probably have skipped a few steps there but I'm happier with the maths if i write it long hand)
 
Very well said, EmilyM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
24K