Why is my compound pendulum experiment not proving Rouths Rule?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around difficulties in proving the compound pendulum theory using a specific formula to estimate gravity and the radius of gyration. The initial experiment involved measuring the time period of a swinging bar, yielding an estimated gravity of 9.84 and a radius of gyration of 0.268. The confusion arose from the application of Routh's Rule, which states that k^2 = (L^2)/3, while the correct formula for the center of mass is k^2 = (L^2)/12. After clarification, it was confirmed that using the correct formula resolved the issues, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationship between different moments of inertia. Accurate application of these principles is crucial for successful experimentation in compound pendulum studies.
EmilyM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble prooving a basic compound pendulum theory - my company makes a piece of kit designed to do just that.

In a simple experiment involving a long thin bar which is set on a knife edge and allowed to swing freely I have been changing the length of the bar and measuring the time period.

The equation is tau = 2 pi * sqrt((k^2 + h^2) / g * h) designed to enable us to find a local estimate for g (gravity) and k - the radius of gyration of the rod. Plotting a graph and rearranging the eqn into y = mx + c gives an estimation of 9.84 for gravity (very good) and 0.268 for k.

The theory for k is simple, Rouths Rule states k^2 = (L^2) / 3. This gives k = 0.528.

Help. Have redone the expt over and over with increasing accuracy to no avail. Am confident that Rouths Rule holds as is 12.7mm diameter st/st rod with L = 915mm.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
EmilyM: If you want to use tau = 2*pi*[(k^2 + h^2)/(g*h)]^0.5, then you must use k^2 = (L^2)/12, not k^2 = (L^2)/3. But if you want to use k^2 = (L^2)/3, then you must use tau = 2*pi*[(0.25*k^2 + h^2)/(g*h)]^0.5. See if this resolves your problem.
 
Oh dear! Well that's what it is then, works perfectly now - thank you so much!

Ps, tau is the letter representing time period in the textbooks/refs I've been using...
 
I should also mention, the best form for your tau formula is the one you listed in your first post (which is the same as the first tau formula I listed in my post), because it is general, and is therefore applicable to any object shape. Then, for your current, particular bar shape (a uniform bar), use k^2 = (L^2)/12.
 
I agree, and I also now understand that my experiment was finding k at the centre of mass but the original formula I was using to find theoretical k (k^2 = (L^2) / 3) is to find k at the end of the bar.

k^2 = (L^2)/12 finds k at the centre of mass and this is what i wanted. The two are ofcourse related by the parallel axis theorem so that to 'move' from k at the centre of mass to k at the end of the bar you must add on a factor which is the distance squared, in this case (L/2)^2 or (L^2)/4. Then we have k^2 = (L^2)/12 + (L^2)/4 = (L^2)/12 + 3(L^2)/12 = 4(L^2)/12 = (L^2)/3 (most people could probably have skipped a few steps there but I'm happier with the maths if i write it long hand)
 
Very well said, EmilyM.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top