Why Is My Converted Galvanometer Not Matching Standard Ammeter Readings?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around issues faced when converting a galvanometer into an ammeter, specifically the discrepancies between the galvanometer readings and those of a standard ammeter. Key advice includes ensuring proper placement of connections to avoid resistance errors and using a variable resistor for fine-tuning the readings. Participants emphasize the importance of measuring millivolts directly across the shunt rather than including additional resistance from connectors. It is also noted that exact calculations for resistance may not be necessary, as practical adjustments can improve accuracy. Overall, the conversation provides valuable troubleshooting tips for achieving accurate ammeter readings with a converted galvanometer.
ajaykrishna90
I am trying to convert galvanometer into an ammeter. But after finding Galvanometer resistance and shunt values, and cut a wire according to that thickness and connected. But still, the galavanometer reading is not similar to that of the standard ammeter reading connected in the circuit. Any one can help me please? In detail.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ajaykrishna90 said:
Galvanometer resistance
And, what is that resistance?
ajaykrishna90 said:
cut a wire according to that thickness
What wire? What resistance?
ajaykrishna90 said:
not similar to that of the standard ammeter
What current are you trying to measure?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I've found that placing a variable resistance on the order of 1/4 - 1/2 the coil resistance is useful as you can never quite get the shunt wire correct and the resistor will allow you an added adjustment.
Don't obsess over exact calculations as neither the meter resistance nor shunt will be exact.
Also, don't attach the meter at the far ends of the shunt because the resistance of the connections will contribute error. Rather, attach the meter to the shunt a little ways in from one connection. Then, move the other meter lead along the length to get the correct reading while a test current flows.
- Reference Kelvin Connection.

Hope this helps a bit.

- Mike
 
Mike bro thanks a lot. Its great. Got some new tips. I will try. Thanks again.
 
Mike_In_Plano said:
Also, don't attach the meter at the far ends of the shunt because the resistance of the connections will contribute error.

Mike pointed out the most common beginner's mistake.
Think about it - you're using the galvanometer as a voltmeter to read the milivolts across your shunt, which is probably only milli-ohms.
Here's a picture from a Kelvin link as Mike suggested
00480.png

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_8/9.html
You need the millivolts across the shunt itself,
NOT the millivolts across the shunt PLUS millivolts across the connectors.
I used to cut my shunt wire a little long so there's room for the current connections outside my meter connections.

old jim
 
Thanks a lot
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top