Why is Rope Distance Not Part of the Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EV33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope
EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
This is not really a homework problem but just a question.

How come while doing pump problems distance is part of the equation but rope problems distance is not...


For example your rope integral might look like integral from zero to fifty of (25-(.5)x) dx

Here all that 25-(.5)x is the weight of the rope...


But a pump integral may look like the integral from zero to three of ((8x)(9.8)(1000)(5-x))dx

Here (5-x) represents the distance the water travels...


How come there is nothing that represents the distance the rope travels in the rope problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the actual questions to the examples I gave would make my question more understandable I can write them out, but I figured it was probably not necessary.
 
If you are talking about the work required to lift a rope that is hanging down up to the point from which it is hanging, and x represents the height of a point on the rope then the "piece" of rope is lifted L- x where L is the length of the rope. If, instead, x is the distance from the point on the rope to the point where it is hanging, the distance is x.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top