B Why is state transition probability symmetric?

normvcr
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
Restricting to finite dimensional QP, suppose a system is in a state S1, an experiment is done, and state S2 is one of the eigenstates (assume all eigenvalues are distinct). The probability that the system transitions from S1 to S2 is p = Trace( S1*S2), using state operator notation. On the other hand, if a system is in state S2, a different experiment is done, and state S1 is one of the eigenstates,, the probability that the system transitions from S2 to S1 is, again, p, due to the symmetry of the Trace inner product. Is there a physical rationale why these two state transition probabilties are the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not directly the probability, it is just proportional to it.

This is the time-symmetry of (nonrelativistic) quantum mechanics.
 
Time symmetry is an interesting perspective. The difficulty I have with this, though, is that the two directions of state transition require two different experiments.
BTW, it is directly probability, as the p's add up to 1, owing to the states having trace 1.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top