B Why is state transition probability symmetric?

normvcr
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
Restricting to finite dimensional QP, suppose a system is in a state S1, an experiment is done, and state S2 is one of the eigenstates (assume all eigenvalues are distinct). The probability that the system transitions from S1 to S2 is p = Trace( S1*S2), using state operator notation. On the other hand, if a system is in state S2, a different experiment is done, and state S1 is one of the eigenstates,, the probability that the system transitions from S2 to S1 is, again, p, due to the symmetry of the Trace inner product. Is there a physical rationale why these two state transition probabilties are the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not directly the probability, it is just proportional to it.

This is the time-symmetry of (nonrelativistic) quantum mechanics.
 
Time symmetry is an interesting perspective. The difficulty I have with this, though, is that the two directions of state transition require two different experiments.
BTW, it is directly probability, as the p's add up to 1, owing to the states having trace 1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top