Why is sucralose also known as trichlorosucrose in nomenclature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nomenclature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Sucralose, commonly referred to as trichlorosucrose, is a synthetic sweetener whose nomenclature raises questions regarding its chemical structure. The systematic IUPAC name for sucralose is 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside, which accurately reflects its molecular composition. The term "trichlorosucrose" lacks specificity regarding the positions of chlorine atoms and does not indicate the absence of hydroxyl (OH) groups, making it a less precise descriptor. The discussion highlights the distinction between systematic and trivial names in chemical nomenclature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of IUPAC nomenclature
  • Familiarity with organic chemistry concepts, particularly sugar derivatives
  • Knowledge of molecular structure representation
  • Basic grasp of chemical bonding and functional groups
NEXT STEPS
  • Research IUPAC naming conventions for organic compounds
  • Study the structural characteristics of sugar derivatives
  • Explore the implications of trivial names in chemical communication
  • Learn about the synthesis and applications of sucralose in food science
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, food scientists, and students of organic chemistry who seek to understand the complexities of chemical nomenclature and the properties of synthetic sweeteners.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Why is sucralose also called trichlorosucrose? Is this alternate name correct in the nomenclature sense? Why are the positions of the chlorine atoms not indicated in “trichlorosucrose”, and why is it not indicated in this term that the molecule lacks OH groups on the respective carbons by including the term “deoxy”?

Thank you.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I would say the only correct name is (according to wikipedia, but I guess it doesn't matter much) 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside - this is a systematic IUPAC name. Every other name is just a customary (or common - my English fails me here) name and looking for any logic behind is a waste of time. That is - there can be some logic, but there is no well defined, fail proof system.

--
 
Ok, the English you're referring to would be "trivial name"? Just for crying out loud.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
12K