Why Is the Coefficient of Restitution Less Than 1 in a Tennis Racket Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of restitution (COR) in a tennis racket collision, specifically when a ball traveling at 10 m/s hits a stationary racket. The COR is incorrectly calculated by the original poster, leading to a value greater than 1, which is impossible. The correct formula requires using the relative speeds after and before the collision, with attention to the direction of the velocities. The mistake involves the order of velocities and the sign, which must be reversed to obtain the correct COR. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
charlie1990
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. calculate the coefficient of restitution when a player hits a ball traveling into a racket at 10m/s and the racket is stationary before the ball hits it. after the ball hits it, the ball has a velocity of 5m/s and the racket is moving in the opposite direction at 1 m/s (Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
I know this is what's used to get the answer normally, but I am getting the wrong answer (above 1).


I think it has something to do with racket going opposite direction but not sure what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
charlie1990 said:
(Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
 
Doc Al said:
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
cheers, poor mistake
 
charlie1990 said:
cheers, poor mistake
... and the sign reverses.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top