Why Is the Coefficient of Restitution Less Than 1 in a Tennis Racket Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of restitution (COR) in a tennis racket collision, specifically when a ball traveling at 10 m/s hits a stationary racket. The COR is incorrectly calculated by the original poster, leading to a value greater than 1, which is impossible. The correct formula requires using the relative speeds after and before the collision, with attention to the direction of the velocities. The mistake involves the order of velocities and the sign, which must be reversed to obtain the correct COR. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
charlie1990
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. calculate the coefficient of restitution when a player hits a ball traveling into a racket at 10m/s and the racket is stationary before the ball hits it. after the ball hits it, the ball has a velocity of 5m/s and the racket is moving in the opposite direction at 1 m/s (Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
I know this is what's used to get the answer normally, but I am getting the wrong answer (above 1).


I think it has something to do with racket going opposite direction but not sure what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
charlie1990 said:
(Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
 
Doc Al said:
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
cheers, poor mistake
 
charlie1990 said:
cheers, poor mistake
... and the sign reverses.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top