Why is the current reading the same in each lamp in a parallel circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phillyj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Lab
AI Thread Summary
In a parallel circuit, the current measured was consistently 12.8 amps across all lamps, which raised questions about the accuracy of the readings. The user noted that in a series circuit, the current was 1.7 amps, despite the power supply being rated at 1.5 amps. The discussion highlighted the importance of checking meter settings and considering factors like lamp impedance and power supply output. It was suggested that the lamps should not vary in brightness in either configuration unless they were different types. Overall, the user was encouraged to verify their setup and meter settings to resolve the discrepancies in current readings.
phillyj
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi, I wasn't sure I should post this here.
We did a lab on series and parallel circuits and it went great until we got to the parallel circuit. The meters were connected in the correct way but for some reason, the current showed up on the meter as 12.8 (amps?) in each of the lamps.
In series, there was 1.7 amps in each of the lamps. There's no way that's 12 amps. Is it 1.28 amps? My TA doesn't know so any ideas?


http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/3258/92456738.jpg

That was my setup where X is the light bulb.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread moved to Homework Help (homework/coursework/labwork belongs here)

The result seems a bit off, but comes close to being correct. What is the expected power supply current difference for the series and parallel cases (what is relative total impedance of 3 series lamps versus 3 parallel lamps)?

And what other correction factors should you consider? What is the impedance of the meter compared to the lamps? Were the lamps a lot brighter in the parallel configuration? Was the lamp where the meter was any dimmer than the other two lamps in the parallel configuration? What is the output impedance of your power supply?

Given that you measured 1.7A for the series case, what would you guess should be the current in the parallel case if the lamps were the same brightness as the series case, and the output impedance of the power supply were negligible? Would the parallel current be higher or lower for each of the correction factors I've mentioned?
 
Sorry I didn't mention more.
IIRC, The power supply is rated at 5 V and 1.5 A. Yes, I'm sort of wondering why it said 1.7 A for series when the rating was 1.5A; maybe I changed the settings?

In series, the lights grew in brightness i.e Lamp1<Lamp2<Lamp3.
Parallel, they were the same.
This tells me I connected everything correctly. I'm not sure If my meter was set to the wrong setting. 12 amps makes no sense.
 
phillyj said:
Sorry I didn't mention more.
IIRC, The power supply is rated at 5 V and 1.5 A. Yes, I'm sort of wondering why it said 1.7 A for series when the rating was 1.5A; maybe I changed the settings?

In series, the lights grew in brightness i.e Lamp1<Lamp2<Lamp3.
Parallel, they were the same.
This tells me I connected everything correctly. I'm not sure If my meter was set to the wrong setting. 12 amps makes no sense.

Yeah, probably the wrong setting. And the lamps should not vary in brightness in either case, unless they are different types of lamps. Maybe in the series case they were barely turning on, so variations in manufacturing tolerances were more apparent than when they were all on full in the parallel case.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top