1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why is the expectation value of an observable what it is (the formula)

  1. Apr 12, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I really do not understand why the expectation value of an observable such as position is
    <x> = [itex]\int\Psi*(x)\Psi[/itex]

    2. Relevant equations
    If Q is an operator then
    <Q> = = [itex]\int\Psi*(Q)\Psi[/itex]
    cn = <f,[itex]\Psi>[/itex]


    3. The attempt at a solution
    What I understand this is saying is that since x is a linear transformation and [itex]\Psi[/itex] is an eigenvector, by x[itex]\Psi[/itex] would be a vector in position space. Then taking the expectation value is like taking the inner product of [itex]\Psi[/itex], and a position eigenfunction. But why would that give an average value? What I vaguely understand is that [itex]\int\Psi^{2}[/itex], is the probability density and multiplying operator by probability would give the average value. But I'm still confused as connecting linear algebra with probability and quantum, I'm having a hard time with that.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 13, 2014 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    It is like a weighted average, where the weight appears via the wave function in the integral.
    It just works this way. Why? Ask nature.
     
  4. Apr 13, 2014 #3

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    It's important to understand this. It's the key of the probabilistic meaning of the quantum mechanical state. An observable is represented by a self-adjoint operator in Hilbert space, and there's a complete set of (generalized) eigenfunctions [itex]u_j(x)[/itex] of this operator. The (generatlized) eigen values (or better "spectral values") of the operator are the possible values the observable can take, and the probability to measure the [itex]j[/itex]th eigenvalue, given the system is prepared in a state described by the normalized wave function [itex]\psi[/itex], is given by
    [tex]P_j=\left |\int \mathrm{d}^3 x u_j^*(x) \psi(x) \right|^2.[/tex]
    The expectation value is then given by
    [tex]\langle O \rangle = \sum_j o_j P_j.[/tex]
    Using the completeness of the (generalized) wave functions you can then easily show that you can write this expectation value in the way given in your question.
     
  5. Apr 13, 2014 #4
    Ok, I understand, that makes sense.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Why is the expectation value of an observable what it is (the formula)
Loading...