Why is the kinetic energy formula for this problem using the radius?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving kinetic energy calculations where the radius plays a crucial role in the formula. The equation presented includes terms that account for different masses and velocities, specifically incorporating the radius in the form of 12/18. The user expresses confusion about the necessity of including the radius in the kinetic energy terms. The inquiry seeks clarification on the rationale behind this aspect of the problem. Understanding the relationship between radius and kinetic energy is essential for grasping the overall solution.
pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
I attached the problem.

The solution is of the form:
.5*(5/32.2)v^2+.5(10/32.2)(12/18*v)^2 + 5*18/12*sin(60)-10*12/12*sin60=0

I don't understand why they put the radius in the kinetic energies like the 12/18 part. I know you have to do that, but I don't understand why.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    22.1 KB · Views: 456
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Pyroknife,

Please submit your approach to the solution first.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is（Figure 2）： F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why is the Kinetic Energy of a Spring (1/6)mv²?
Replies
13
Views
2K
Energy stored in a double spring system
Replies
17
Views
1K
Finding the final speed of a space probe using work and kinetic energy
Replies
7
Views
2K
Conservation of energy problem: Ball rolling down inclined plane and then through a loop-the-loop
Replies
10
Views
2K
Conservation of Momentum Problem - Mechanical and Kinetic Energies
Replies
2
Views
913
Confused about a conservation of energy problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
Using Orbital Energy to Calculate Velocity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Potential and Kinetic energy equations including drag coefficient
Replies
1
Views
1K
Problem with when to use Force and Energy. What compresses spring/
Replies
3
Views
1K
Signs in torque - different analyses using different sign notations?
Replies
11
Views
738

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top