Why is the magnitude of its acceleration less on the descent

AI Thread Summary
The magnitude of acceleration of a block sliding down a ramp is less than during its ascent due to the opposing forces of friction acting differently in each direction. When the block moves upward, friction acts downward, opposing the motion, while during descent, friction acts upward, again opposing the motion. This results in a greater net force acting on the block when ascending compared to descending. Additionally, the analysis can be framed in terms of conservation of energy, where kinetic energy is converted to gravitational potential energy and work against friction during ascent, and vice versa during descent. Ultimately, the difference in net forces and energy dynamics accounts for the reduced acceleration on the descent.
katana
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is sort of a concept problem.
It says: A block is given a push so that it slides up a ramp. AFter the block reaches its highest opint, it slides back down. Why is the magnitude of its acceleration less on the descent than on the ascent?

I know it as to do with friction but I don't see how the friction forces are different on the ascent and the descent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a hint: Friction always acts to oppose slipping between surfaces. So... when the block slides up the ramp, which way is it slipping with respect to the ramp surface? So which way must friction act? Do the same analysis for the block sliding down the ramp. Then compare total force on the block in both cases.
 
You could also try to analyse it in terms of Conservation of Energy if you want. When you initially give the box a push, the box will use up its kinetic energy to gain GPE and do work against friction. Afterwards, the GPE will be used to do work against friction again and give the box kinetic energy to reach the bottom.

Another way of tackling this is to resolve the forces acting on the box, which you will find:
Going up: mg sin @ + friction (both downwards)
Going down: mg sin @ (downwards) - friction (upwards)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top