Why is the production of pions in D-D fusion not allowed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gildomar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Pion
gildomar
Messages
98
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



"Assuming that the incident deuteron has sufficient energy, why is the reaction d+d \rightarrow He^{4}_{2}+\pi^{0} not allowed?"

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've gone through the various conservation laws that apply in a strong reaction (energy, charge, baryon number, lepton number, spin, isospin, isospin z-component, strangeness, charge conjugation, time reversal), and as far as I can tell, they're conserved (though it's a little tricky checking parity conservation). And since there's two products, momentum should be able to be conserved as well. And I know that there's nothing intrinsically wrong with just the left side, since deuteron-deuteron fusion is a viable process, but that had a nucleus and a nucleon as products, not a nucleus and a meson. Unless I messed up checking one of the conserved quantities, the closest that I can figure is that emitting a nucleon instead of a meson lowers the Q-value of the process, and is thus more favored. Or that the secondary product from the reaction (other than the nucleus) has to have directly participated in the reaction in order to properly carry off the remaining energy/momentum instead of having been part of the field around the reaction (hence why a nucleon is emitted).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apart from parity (where I don't know it), I see nothing that would prevent the process. I guess it is unlikely as you need significant and nearly equal momentum transfer for two nuclei at the same time, but the question does not ask about the probability.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top