Why is the ratio of displacements in springs different than expected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter erisedk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Springs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a block attached to two springs with different spring constants. The user initially applies energy conservation incorrectly, leading to the conclusion that the ratio of displacements y/x equals one, which is incorrect. The correct ratio is 1/2, as indicated by the hint provided. The reasoning involves treating the block and the supports as separate systems during the displacements. Understanding the mechanics of the system and correctly applying energy conservation principles is crucial for solving the problem.
erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A block (B) is attached to two unstretched springs S1 and S2 with spring constants k and 4k, respectively (see figure I). The other ends are attached to identical supports M1 and M2 not attached to the walls. The springs and supports have negligible mass. There is no friction anywhere. The block B is displaced towards wall 1 by a small distance x (figure II) and released. The block returns and moves a maximum distance y towards wall 2. Displacements x and y are measured with respect to the equilibrium position of the block B. The ratio y/x is

1423749846508Capture.PNG

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really know how to do this, but here's what I know:
From energy conservation, 1/2 k x2 + 1/2 (4k) x2 = 1/2 k y2 + 1/2 (4k) y2
So, I get y=x.
Which isn't the answer. The answer is (C).
I don't understand why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's (C) mean?
 
Oh sorry, I meant the answer is 1/2
 
Hint : Energy conservation is the correct method to use here. Application, though, is wrong.

When you move B x to the right, consider M2 and B to be one system(Why?).
Similarly, when B moves y to the left, consider M1 and B to be one system(Why?).

The reasoning for this can be obtained from diagram II.

Hope this helps,
Qwertywerty.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top