Why is the second approach incorrect? pulley problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the incorrectness of the second method used to solve a pulley problem. Method 1 is deemed correct because it treats the entire system as a single object, focusing on external forces, while Method 2 improperly combines forces in different directions, leading to an erroneous equation. The key issue is that Method 2 attempts to equate a vector force with a scalar acceleration, which is conceptually flawed. Properly applying Newton's second law to each mass separately and considering their accelerations as equal resolves the problem. Understanding the distinction between vector and scalar quantities is crucial for solving such mechanics problems accurately.
EastWindBreaks
Messages
128
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



IMG_1895.jpg

Homework Equations


friction force = F_v
m=m1

The Attempt at a Solution



is method 1 correct? if so, why method 2 came out with a totally incorrect answer.
I understand that you can also set up acceleration equations for m1 and m2, since their acceleration are equal, and solve the system of equation. I am just curious if I can do it by force components. [/B]
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1895.jpg
    IMG_1895.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 856
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I actually have a question about your method 1. You are taking mg, which is in the y direction, and Fv, which is in the x direction, and just adding them as algebraic quantities. How are you able to do that? Does that not say that method 1 is wrong?
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
I actually have a question about your method 1. You are taking mg, which is in the y direction, and Fv, which is in the x direction, and just adding them as algebraic quantities. How are you able to do that? Does that not say that method 1 is wrong?
Yes,you can, because in the first method, I am treating the system as a whole(single object), so, only external forces matters.
 
EastWindBreaks said:
why method 2 came out with a totally incorrect answer.
First, you need to say exactly what you mean by Fx and Fy.
 
  • Like
Likes EastWindBreaks
haruspex said:
First, you need to say exactly what you mean by Fx and Fy.
Hello, I meant Fx as in sum of forces in x direction, Fy as sum of forces in y direction
 
EastWindBreaks said:
Hello, I meant Fx as in sum of forces in x direction, Fy as sum of forces in y direction
Sum of forces on what system?
 
  • Like
Likes EastWindBreaks
haruspex said:
Sum of forces on what system?
on the entire pulley system
 
haruspex said:
Sum of forces on what system?
I guess Ft-Fv=(m1+m2)*a and m1g-Ft=(m1+m2)*a as well, equating them would be sufficient? since they have same acceleration.
 
EastWindBreaks said:
on the entire pulley system
Two masses plus string? ... plus pulley? ... plus bench?
Whichever you pick, you are missing some external forces in your equation.
 
  • Like
Likes EastWindBreaks
  • #10
Write Newton's second law separately for the masses. The hanging mass moves in the vertical (y) direction, with vertical acceleration a1, The sliding mass moves in the horizontal direction with horizontal acceleration a2. The tension in the rope is T, the same everywhere. So m1a1= m1g -T
m2a2 = T-fr.
As the length of the rope is constant, the magnitude of the accelerations are the same a1=a2=a. We can consider a as the acceleration along the rope, making the problem one-dimensional. Adding the equations above, the tension cancels, and you get the acceleration in terms of the external forces /gravity, friction) and the sum of the masses.
upload_2017-10-25_10-5-54.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-10-25_10-5-54.png
    upload_2017-10-25_10-5-54.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 342
  • Like
Likes EastWindBreaks
  • #11
The problem in the second method is that you are first writing the equation of motion for each mass, and then taking the forces on the different masses as a single force with x and y components. That gives you your equation
√(Fx2 + Fy 2) = a (m1 + m2)
This is wrong because you now have a force on the left with some weird direction, and an acceleration on the right, which is either horizontal or vertical (they are the same).
 
  • Like
Likes EastWindBreaks
  • #12
Chandra Prayaga said:
The problem in the second method is that you are first writing the equation of motion for each mass, and then taking the forces on the different masses as a single force with x and y components. That gives you your equation
√(Fx2 + Fy 2) = a (m1 + m2)
This is wrong because you now have a force on the left with some weird direction, and an acceleration on the right, which is either horizontal or vertical (they are the same).
wow, right on the point! that makes sense now. thank you!
 
  • #13
Chandra Prayaga said:
The problem in the second method is that you are first writing the equation of motion for each mass, and then taking the forces on the different masses as a single force with x and y components. That gives you your equation
√(Fx2 + Fy 2) = a (m1 + m2)
This is wrong because you now have a force on the left with some weird direction, and an acceleration on the right, which is either horizontal or vertical (they are the same).
If all the external forces are added vectorially, and the sum is divided by the whole mass, it gives the acceleration of the center of mass. Among the external force is also the force the pulley acts on the system of two masses connected by the rope.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top