Why is the speed of a particle in a conical pendulum related to the angle theta?

Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle is suspended from a fixed point by a light inextensible string of length a. Investigate 'conical motions' of this pendulum in which a string maintains a constant angle \thetawith the downward vertical. Show that , for any acute angle theta
ex], a conical motion exists and that the particle speed u is given by u^2=a*g*sin(\theta)*tan(\theta)

Homework Equations



dv/dt= (r''-r(\theta)^2)r-hat + (r(\theta)''+2r'(\theta)')\theta-hat

The Attempt at a Solution



since the motion of the particle goes around in a circle, I know that r''=r'=0; therefore :

dv/dt='-r(\theta)^2)r-hat + (r(\theta'\theta-hat

let \rho be the radius of the cricle; therefore \rho = L*sin(\theta, L is the length of the string. the pendulum makes a circle in they xy plane. In the z direction, from the circle that lies on the xy plane to the top of the pendulum , k=L*cos(\theta)

I think there are three forces that act on the string: centripetal force, the gravitational force, the force of the inextensible string, and I think air resistance is small , so I can neglect air resistance.

-m*L*(\theta)''=mg*cos(\theta) - T+ mv^2/(L*cos(\theta)
-m*L*(\theta)''=mg*sin(\theta)

I not sure if I need to integrate dv/dt to calculate the equation of motion and then square v after I have integrated dv/dt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benzoate said:
I think there are three forces that act on the string: centripetal force, the gravitational force, the force of the inextensible string …

-m*L*(\theta)''=mg*cos(\theta) - T+ mv^2/(L*cos(\theta)
-m*L*(\theta)''=mg*sin(\theta)

I not sure if I need to integrate dv/dt to calculate the equation of motion and then square v after I have integrated dv/dt

Hi Benzoate! :smile:

I'm not really following your equations :confused:

There are two forces … tension, and gravitation … they have to match the acceleration

and the acceleration is purely radial (zero tangential) …

and you need to find T anyway …

try again! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Benzoate! :smile:

I'm not really following your equations :confused:

There are two forces … tension, and gravitation … they have to match the acceleration

and the acceleration is purely radial (zero tangential) …

and you need to find T anyway …

try again! :smile:

I would used the equation of acceleration in polar for right where:

a=(-r*(\theta)^2')r-hat+(r*\theta'')theta-hat

Would the sum of the gravitational and tension forces be the sum of the centripetal force? If so then may=T*cos(\theta)-mg=0==> T=mg/cos(\theta), and max=T*sin(\theta)==>ax= mg/cos(\theta)*sin(\theta)=mg*tan(\theta) right?

r=L*sin(\theta)
 
Hi Benzoate! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a squared: ² :smile:)
Benzoate said:
I would used the equation of acceleration in polar for right where:

a=(-r*(\theta)^2')r-hat+(r*\theta'')theta-hat

Would the sum of the gravitational and tension forces be the sum of the centripetal force? If so then may=T*cos(\theta)-mg=0==> T=mg/cos(\theta), and max=T*sin(\theta)==>ax= mg/cos(\theta)*sin(\theta)=mg*tan(\theta) right?

r=L*sin(\theta)

Wow! That's perfect! :smile:

Now (since θ'' = 0 and rθ' = v), just use v²/r instead of rθ'² and you have the answer!
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Benzoate! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a squared: ² :smile:)


Wow! That's perfect! :smile:

Now (since θ'' = 0 and rθ' = v), just use v²/r instead of rθ'² and you have the answer!


Don't quite understand why \theta'' is zero. Here are my calculations :


mv2/L*sin(\theta)=mg*tan(\theta) , m cancel out and therefore I am left with: v2=g*tan(\theta)*L*sin(\theta)
 
Hi Benzoate! :smile:

(what happened to that θ I gave you?)
v2=g*tan(\theta)*L*sin(\theta)

That's right! That's the given answer (with L instead of a). :smile:

(and θ'' = 0 because the string is always radial, and there's never any tangential acceleration :wink:)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top