Why Is the Third Pendulum Traveling the Fastest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim1174
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a time-lapse photo of three pendulums positioned at different angles, with confusion regarding which pendulum is traveling the fastest. Participants seek clarification on the definition of "fastest" and the context needed to interpret the pendulum's speeds accurately. There is a call for a better description and the actual photo to facilitate understanding. Questions are raised about the observer's frame of reference and the direction of each pendulum's movement. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for more information to resolve the confusion about the pendulum's speeds.
jim1174
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
You have a Photo of a pendulum with three pendulums. One is at an angle to the right the second Is straight down and third is at an angle to the left. The pengulum in the middle is traveling the greatest speed but why is the third one traveling the fastest ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jim1174 said:
You have a Photo of a pendulum with three pendulums.
That really doesn't make much sense. One pendulum with three pendulums?

Perhaps you mean a time-lapse photo showing one pendulum in three different positions? I think we need more context and a better description to be able to interpret your question.
 
Yea I meant a time laps photo sorry. If the one is the middle is traveling the greatest speed then wouldn't it also be traveling the fastest?
 
jim1174 said:
Yea I meant a time laps photo sorry. If the one is the middle is traveling the greatest speed then wouldn't it also be traveling the fastest?
What is "fastest"? According to whom? Apparently we need more context. What is the frame of reference of the observer and the frame of reference of the pendulum?

Edit: Also, which direction is the pendulum moving in for each of the positions shown?
 
jim1174 said:
You have a Photo of a pendulum with three pendulums.

Can you post the photo? Use the UPOAD button.
 
For fun I was trying to use energy considerations to determine the depth to which a solid object will sink in a fluid to reach equilibrium. The first approach that I tried was just to consider the change in potential energy of the block and the fluid as the block is lowered some unknown distance d into the fluid similar to what is shown in the answer to this post. Upon taking the limit as the vessel's cross sectional area approaches infinity I have an extra factor of 2 in the equilibrium...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
This is just to share some teaching experience. A problem about trajectory of a projectile in the atmosphere is very well known. The trajectory has a vertical asymptote. This fact is easy to obtain by using the stability theory. Consider equations of motion. Let ##\boldsymbol v=v_x\boldsymbol e_x+v_y\boldsymbol e_y## be the velocity of the projectile relative the standard Earth fixed frame ##xy## with ##y## directed upwards. The second Newton ##m\boldsymbol {\dot v}=m\boldsymbol g-\gamma...