Why is the 'X' obtained in the experiment different from the expected 'X'?

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involving a marble rolling down a ramp and falling off a desk revealed a significant discrepancy between the expected and actual landing distance. The original formula used did not account for the factor of 2, which could explain part of the 30% difference observed. Additionally, the marble's rolling kinetic energy gained while traversing the flat surface of the table is a crucial factor affecting the results. Sound energy produced upon impact is negligible and does not contribute to the discrepancy. Understanding these factors is essential for accurately predicting the marble's landing distance.
JenDM
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We did an experiment where A marble travels down a ramp,
rolls along for 5 cm, then falls off a desk. The marble starts off
while gravitational potencial energy, and ends with kinetic energy.
We were given a formula for the distance from the desk the marble
lands, 'x', calculated by multiplying the height of the ramp by the
height the desk and square rooting the product. So here's my question:
Why is the expected 'X' so different from the 'X' obtained in the experiment?

Homework Equations


Egpe = mgh
Eke = 1/2mv**2

The Attempt at a Solution



Is the large percent error caused by the marble
having some kinetic energy on the ramp?
HELP!

Jen DM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula for dist from the desk should be 2*sqrt(height of ramp*height of table), assuming no loss in energy for the 5 cm roll. You can deduce it quite easily.
 
I know that that formula shows what should happen, but the results of the experiment show something 30% different, and I was wondering why they are so different, i(e sound energy present?)

I appreciate your help :)

Thanks
 
Your original formula didn't have the factor of 2. So, I thought that could be the reason for the discrepancy.

The marble also has rolling KE, which it gains when it crosses the flat table, which should be the most significant factor. The formula deduced was for just a point mass sliding.

Sound is emitted after the marble strikes the ground and is not relevant, unless of course you mean the sound when it hits the table and rolls across it. That should be very less.
 
That makes sense, since the marble is rolling, not sliding down the ramp.

thank you so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top