Why is this equation about adding pure substances correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HAF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the validity of two equations related to mixing solutions. The first equation addresses the mixing of two solutions, while the second focuses on adding pure substance B to an existing solution. The key point is that when pure B is added, the volume of the original solution (V1) is assumed to remain unchanged, which is a reasonable approximation when both solutions are dilute. This assumption allows for simplification in calculating concentrations, as the volume change from adding a small amount of solute can often be neglected. However, for more precise calculations, especially with concentrated solutions, it's important to consider the volume changes. The disappearance of the term (1 + V2/V1) in the second equation is attributed to this assumption of negligible volume change when adding a small amount of solute.
HAF
Messages
58
Reaction score
6
Hello,
I have a little problem. I try to find out why the second equation in the picture is correct. How can I get it? Down on the paper is what I did.

Where did the (1+V2/V1) disappear from the right side of equation?

Thank You for every help.
Document 13_4.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Document 13_4.jpg
    Document 13_4.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 755
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
In general you are right, something is wrong. Perhaps V2 is much lower than V1, then 1+V2/V1 is approximately 1.
 
Borek said:
In general you are right, something is wrong. Perhaps V2 is much lower than V1, then 1+V2/V1 is approximately 1.
Thank You sir. I really appreciate your help.
 
The clue is in the title of the post. Equation 1 is about mixing two solutions; Equation 2 is about adding pure B to a solution. There is no V2 and c2; n2 moles of pure B are added to solution 1. The assumption is that this does not result in any change to the volume V1 of the solution, which is a good approximation if c1 and c3 are both dilute.
 
  • Like
Likes Borek
mjc123 said:
The clue is in the title of the post. Equation 1 is about mixing two solutions; Equation 2 is about adding pure B to a solution. There is no V2 and c2; n2 moles of pure B are added to solution 1. The assumption is that this does not result in any change to the volume V1 of the solution, which is a good approximation if c1 and c3 are both dilute.
I understand what you want to tell me but can I ask something?

Why by adding pure B the volume does not change?
 
It does change, but not by very much if the solutions are dilute. If the volume of solute is much smaller than the volume of solvent, it can often be practically ignored, and we can say with minimal error that concentration = moles of solute/volume of solvent. For highly accurate work we need to take volume changes into account, and of course the assumption breaks down for concentrated solutions.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top