Why Isn't Work Included in the Sum of Forces in Dynamics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why work is not included in the sum of forces in dynamics. It clarifies that while weight and spring force act in opposite directions, only the net forces are considered in the sum. The weight of the body contributes to a downward net force, which causes downward acceleration, albeit slower than free fall. The upward force from the springs and the inertial force of the body are also accounted for in this dynamic. Understanding the energy stored in springs, represented by the formula ½.kx², is emphasized as essential for solving related problems.
Marchese_alex
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
One question about this excercise. Why "W" isn't included in the sum of forces? Is doing work because is in the same direction of the movement, so I would assume that both the force of spring and weight would be in in my sum of forces. But this is not the case here, why is that?
 

Attachments

  • 20121008_212647.jpg
    20121008_212647.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight of the body is partially opposed by the springs, but not fully. The resultant net force is downward and it accelerates the body downwards (but more slowly than if it were in free-fall). The force down is the weight, and the force up is that of two springs together with the inertial force (F = ma) of the body as it is accelerated.

You don't need to use calculus here if you memorize the formula that the energy stored in a linear spring is ½.kx² (and if you forget this formula you can work it out when needed like the author does here). :smile:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
102
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
720
Back
Top