Why Must Acceleration Be Constant for the Equation v² = u² + 2as?

AI Thread Summary
For the equation v² = u² + 2as to apply, acceleration must be constant in both magnitude and direction. This requirement stems from the derivation of the equation, which assumes uniform acceleration. Without constant acceleration, the relationship between initial speed, final speed, and distance traveled becomes invalid. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding kinematic equations and the graphical representation of motion. The area under the velocity-time graph, which represents distance, is crucial for grasping why these conditions are necessary.
air-in
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Warning: Template must be used for homework help.
An object has initial speed u and acceleration a. After traveling a distance s, its final speed is v.
Which of the following includes the two conditions necessary for the equation, v^2 = u^2 +2as, to apply?

I know the answer is a has constant magnitude and a has constant direction, but I am not sure why. Could someone please explain this to me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello air-in,

Welcome to PF! :)

air-in said:
An object has initial speed u and acceleration a. After traveling a distance s, its final speed is v.
Which of the following includes the two conditions necessary for the equation, v^2 = u^2 +2as, to apply?

I know the answer is a has constant magnitude and a has constant direction, but I am not sure why. Could someone please explain this to me?

Before we proceed further, what level of mathematics is used in your class/coursework? Is calculus required for your coursework material? How about differential equations?

Is the "why" part of the assigned problem, or are you just curious?
 
collinsmark said:
Hello air-in,

Welcome to PF! :)
Before we proceed further, what level of mathematics is used in your class/coursework? Is calculus required for your coursework material? How about differential equations?

Is the "why" part of the assigned problem, or are you just curious?

I am currently taking calculus, and we have used differential equations. However, I believe either Algebra 2/Trig or Precalc is required for the course.
I am choosing to do test corrections, and the "why" part is mandatory.
 
air-in said:
I am currently taking calculus, and we have used differential equations. However, I believe either Algebra 2/Trig or Precalc is required for the course.
I am choosing to do test corrections, and the "why" part is mandatory.

This might get a little difficult without calculus, since the equation was derived using calculus, under the assumption that the acceleration is uniform. Never fear though, it may be possible to explain without calculus.

You can derive the uniform acceleration, kinematics equation, v^2 = u^2 + 2as by combining other kinematics equations for uniform acceleration. I'll let you do that yourself, but first I'd like to take a look at one of the more simple, uniform acceleration, kinematics equations.

Consider another uniform acceleration, kinematics equation:

v = u + at

Make a graph of v vs. t. Notice that it's a straight line (of the form y = mx + b, with simple substitutions).

What is the slope of the line? How does the slope of that line relate to acceleration?

(And what is the area under the curve? [we might come back to this later])

Can you see how that v = u + at would not necessarily hold true if the value of the acceleration varied with time? [Assuming you only get to use a single value for a].
 
Last edited:
In my last post I made mention of calculating the area under the curve. It turns out that is pretty important to the "why" part.

Recall that v = u + at is a straight line. For the this exercise of finding the area, assume that both u and a are positive.

So the area under that line is a triangle on top of a rectangle.

The rectangle has a length of t and a height of u.

The triangle on top of it has length of t and a height of at.

So what's the total area? (i.e. what is the sum of the areas of the triangle and rectangle)?

This process of finding the area under the line might seem like a lot of busywork, but it is important for the next step when we come back to the v^2 = u^2 +2as equation.

What assumption did you make when calculating the area under the line? Would the answer be the same if the line was not straight?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top