Why Permanganate Isn't a Coordination Compound

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chemist20
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Permanganate is not classified as a coordination compound because it does not fit the definition based on its formation. Coordination compounds involve a central atom, typically a metal, bonded to ligands through coordinate covalent bonds, where a donor ligand transfers a lone electron pair to the central atom. In the case of permanganate, it is viewed as an inorganic anion rather than a product of a metal cation and ligands, as no chemist considers it as such. Thus, permanganate is simply recognized as an ordinary inorganic anion without requiring a specific designation.
Chemist20
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Okay, simple and probably stupid question: why is permanganate not a coordination compound?after all it's a metal and oxygens which can act as ligands right?

thank you!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Chemist20 said:
Okay, simple and probably stupid question: why is permanganate not a coordination compound?after all it's a metal and oxygens which can act as ligands right?

thank you!

What makes you think it isn't?
 
Chemist20 said:
Okay, simple and probably stupid question: why is permanganate not a coordination compound?after all it's a metal and oxygens which can act as ligands right?

thank you!

It's not simple nor stupid at all. Coordination compounds are defined rather through their fomation than their actual bonding properties. Usually coordinate covalent bonding is understood as a transfer of lone electron pair of a donor ligand (can be ion or neutral molecule) to a bond with central (acceptor) atom. Permanganate is not considered a coordination compound, since no chemist would think of it as a product of Mn7+ cation and 4 O2- anions.
 
asym said:
It's not simple nor stupid at all. Coordination compounds are defined rather through their fomation than their actual bonding properties. Usually coordinate covalent bonding is understood as a transfer of lone electron pair of a donor ligand (can be ion or neutral molecule) to a bond with central (acceptor) atom. Permanganate is not considered a coordination compound, since no chemist would think of it as a product of Mn7+ cation and 4 O2- anions.

ooooh okay, I see. So what would it be then?
 
Chemist20 said:
ooooh okay, I see. So what would it be then?
Just ordinary inorganic anion, no need for a special name.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
26K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top