Why ratio atmospheric ##\nu_\mu : \nu_e = 2:1##

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmospheric Ratio
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Why is the ratio of atmospheric neutrino fluxes expected to be:
R= \frac{\nu_\mu + \bar{\nu}_\mu}{\nu_e +\bar{\nu}_e} =2
for no Neutrino Oscillations?
An answer that I found gives:
\pi \rightarrow \mu \nu_{\mu} \rightarrow e \nu_e \nu_\mu \nu_\mu
But I think this is "wrong" in general, because the muons can reach the Earth before interacting... at least it should be a function of the Zenith angle \theta and their energies (boost).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the spectrum is dominated by low-energetic particles, and low-energetic muons decay in flight.
You also have some other particles producing muon pairs. That ratio of 2 is only an approximation.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top