Why Should Load Reactance Match Generator Reactance for Maximum Power Transfer?

tnho
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An alternating current electrical generator has a fixed internal impedance R_{g}+iX_{g} and is used to supply power to a passive load that has an impedance R_{g} +iX_{l}, where i = \sqrt{-1}, R_{g}\neq 0, and X_{g} \neq 0. For maximum power transfer between the generator and the load, X_{l} should be equal to...

The answer is X_{l}=X_{g}.

However, I don't know how come up with this answer. It seems that the maximum power transmission occur with the imaginary part of the total impedance of the system vanishes. But Why??

Thanks a lot=)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tnho said:

Homework Statement


An alternating current electrical generator has a fixed internal impedance R_{g}+iX_{g} and is used to supply power to a passive load that has an impedance R_{g} +iX_{l}, where i = \sqrt{-1}, R_{g}\neq 0, and X_{g} \neq 0. For maximum power transfer between the generator and the load, X_{l} should be equal to...

The answer is X_{l}=X_{g}.

However, I don't know how come up with this answer. It seems that the maximum power transmission occur with the imaginary part of the total impedance of the system vanishes.

From your last sentence above, it seems that you forgot a negative sign in the equation above.

But Why??

It's a two variable max/min problem from mutivariable calculus.

The power delivered to the load is P=|I^2| R_l. What is I?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top