Why the bond angle of methane is 109 instead of 90?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the geometry of sp3 hybrid orbitals, specifically addressing why the bond angle is approximately 109.5 degrees instead of 90 degrees. It highlights that in three-dimensional space, four points arranged around a central atom form a tetrahedron, which minimizes electron pair repulsion. This tetrahedral arrangement is crucial for the stability of molecules like methane, which has four C-H bonds. A bond angle of 90 degrees would lead to increased repulsion and instability, making the tetrahedral shape and corresponding bond angle of 109.5 degrees essential for molecular stability. The conversation also critiques the limitations of valence shell theory in explaining these concepts effectively.
scientist91
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I know that the sp3 hybrid orbitals form 109 angle, but why the angle is not 90. If the angle is 109 the repulsion is minimized or what? Show some comparations. Thank u.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I believe your problem lies in the fact that you are only looking in two dimensions. What orbital theory are you using? Valence shell theory is useless for all practical applications anyway.
 
3 Dimensions

Indeed, in 3d space four points equally spaced around a center point form a tetrahedron, not a square, hence your bond angle of 109.5 degrees.
 
methane consists of four bonded pairs, i.e 4 C-H bonds. So as to minimize repulsion, the molecule adopts a tetrahedral shape, hence bond angle becomes 109.5. with bond angle of 90, the molecule would not be very stable.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top