Why the Casimir operator is proportional to the unit matrix ?

Wonchu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
now I'm reading Peskin Shroeder.
I have a question about the Casimir operator on page 500 in Chapter 15.

From the following eq,
## \ \ \ [T^b , T^a T^a ] = 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (15.91) ##
## T^2(=T^a T^a) ## is an invariant of the algebra.
Thus the author concludes that ##T^2## is proportional to the unit matrix.
Why is that ?
How to prove it ?

Please Anybody,help me !
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is called Schur's lemma. Look for it. If an element of the algebra commutes with every element it must be the proportional to the identity (as this is the unique element which has this property).
 
Now that you say that,
I recollect I also have heard about that lemma.
Now I can relate to.

Thanks a lot !
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top